58
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An in-vivo study of the combined therapeutic effects of pulsed non-thermal focused ultrasound and radiation for prostate cancer

, , &
Pages 1716-1723 | Received 16 Jan 2023, Accepted 10 May 2023, Published online: 19 May 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vivo combined effects of pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) and radiation (RT) for prostate cancer treatment.

Materials and Methods

An animal prostate tumor model was developed by implanting human LNCaP tumor cells in the prostates of nude mice. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with pFUS, RT or both (pFUS + RT) and compared with a control group. Non-thermal pFUS treatment was delivered by keeping the body temperature below 42 °C as measured real-time by MR thermometry and using a pFUS protocol (1 MHz, 25 W focused ultrasound; 1 Hz pulse rate with a 10% duty cycle for 60 sec for each sonication). Each tumor was covered entirely using 4–8 sonication spots. RT treatment with a dose of 2 Gy was delivered using an external beam (6 MV photon energy with dose rate 300MU/min). Following the treatment, mice were scanned weekly with MRI for tumor volume measurement.

Results

The results showed that the tumor volume in the control group increased exponentially to 142 ± 6%, 205 ± 12%, 286 ± 22% and 410 ± 33% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after treatment, respectively. In contrast, the pFUS group was 29% (p < 0.05), 24% (p < 0.05), 8% and 9% smaller, the RT group was 7%, 10%, 12% and 18% smaller, and the pFUS + RT group was 32%, 39%, 41% and 44% (all with p < 0.05) smaller than the control group at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks post treatment, respectively. Tumors treated by pFUS showed an early response (i.e. the first 2 weeks), while the RT group showed a late response. The combined pFUS + RT treatment showed consistent response throughout the post-treatment weeks.

Conclusions

These results suggest that RT combined with non-thermal pFUS can significantly delay the tumor growth. The mechanism of tumor cell killing between pFUS and RT may be different. Pulsed FUS shows early tumor growth delay, while RT contributes to the late effect on tumor growth delay. The addition of pFUS to RT significantly enhanced the therapeutic effect for prostate cancer treatment.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to InSightec Inc. for their technical support.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported in part by Focused Ultrasound Surgery Foundation, DOD PC073127 and BC102806.

Notes on contributors

Xiaoming Chen

Xiaoming Chen, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Dusica Cvetkovic

Dusica Cvetkovic, MD, is a Research Associate in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Lili Chen

Lili Chen, PhD, is a Professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

C.-M. Ma

C.-M. Ma, PhD, is a Professor and the Director of Medical Physics in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,004.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.