9,321
Views
305
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Blaming the consumer – once again: the social and material contexts of everyday food waste practices in some English households

Pages 429-440 | Received 17 Feb 2011, Accepted 24 Jul 2011, Published online: 17 Aug 2011
 

Abstract

In public debates about the volume of food that is currently wasted by UK households, there exists a tendency to blame the consumer or individualise responsibilities for affecting change. Drawing on ethnographic examples, this article explores the dynamics of domestic food practices and considers their consequences in terms of waste. Discussions are structured around the following themes: (1) feeding the family; (2) eating ‘properly’; (3) the materiality of ‘proper’ food and its intersections with the socio-temporal demands of everyday life and (4) anxieties surrounding food safety and storage. Particular attention is paid to the role of public health interventions in shaping the contexts through which food is at risk of wastage. Taken together, I argue that household food waste cannot be conceptualised as a problem of individual consumer behaviour and suggest that policies and interventions might usefully be targeted at the social and material conditions in which food is provisioned.

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible through funding from the Sustainable Consumption Institute at the University of Manchester. Additional writing was undertaken whilst I was a visiting researcher on the Economic and Social Research Council funded ‘Waste of the World’ programme (RES000232007). I thank Ulla Gustafsson, Liza Draper and Wendy Wills for their helpful guidance and editorial steer. I also thank the two anonymous referees whose useful and insightful comments have no doubt strengthened this article. The usual disclaimers apply. Above all, I am indebted to those who accommodated my sustained presence in their homes during the course of the fieldwork.

Notes

Notes

1. This is not victim blaming insofar as the ‘victims’ are not UK households but those in less developed countries (Stuart Citation2009).

2. The same impact as the emissions generated by ¼ of the cars on UK roads.

3. http://www.lovefoodhatewaste.com [Accessed 8 June 2011].

4. I am not claiming that households never do these things; I am simply highlighting the normativity of binning surplus food.

5. http://www.lovefoodhatewaste.com/recipes [Accessed 3 February 2011].

7. Iceland is a food retailer in the UK that specialises in low-cost frozen foods.

8. Or more accurately, it is cast as excess at which point it is deemed appropriate to dispose of it through the waste stream (Evans forthcoming).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.