Abstract
This paper extends the terms of engagement between social science, posthumanist debates and One Health by questioning whether ‘the public’ may include non-human animals. The One Health concept refers to interdependence between human beings and non-human species in socio-ecological systems. One Health interventions and critiques have tended to emphasize the prevention of zoonotic infections, whereas this paper reflects on more than a decade of engaged research in One Health promotion. Repeatedly, this particular approach to One Health promotion has highlighted the imprint of multi-species entanglements in public life, especially the problematization and politicization of people’s pets. Serious consideration for multi-species entanglements cautions against conflating ‘the public’ with human beings and human interests, to the exclusion of all others. Human beings have never lived separate and apart from non-human species, and we all depend on shared environments. To do justice to multi-species entanglements, socio-ecological theory should undergo expansion in health promotion.
Acknowledgements
I presented an earlier version as a CIHR/IPPH Visiting Lecturer (ICT-138,054) when the University of Sussex hosted a joint conference of the European Association for Social Anthropology’s Medical Anthropology Network and the Royal Anthropological Institute’s Medical Anthropology Committee. More specifically, I presented at the University of Sussex in a panel convened by Simon Cohn and Rebecca Lynch on posthumanism, medical anthropology and global health. I gratefully acknowledge insights that were shared with me by the research participants and within my research team (www.ucalgary.ca/mrock). I especially thank Ann Toohey for providing critical feedback during the writing process, as well as Lydia Vaz for administrative assistance. I also thank the reviewers and the editors for this special issue of Critical Public Health on posthumanism.