Abstract
Combining specialist herbivory with interspecific plant competition can be an effective means of controlling pasture weeds. Cirsium arvense (Canada thistle, Californian thistle, creeping thistle) is one of the worst weeds of pastoral production systems in New Zealand (NZ). The oligophagous leaf-feeding beetle, Cassida rubiginosa, was recently released in NZ for control of C. arvense. To assess the impact of this biocontrol agent we conducted an outdoor potted-plant experiment with low and high densities of Cassida larvae combined with different levels of interspecific competition from typical NZ pasture species. Secondly, we carried out a field-release experiment to quantify the impact of high densities of Cassida under more natural conditions. Interspecific competition reduced all measured plant parameters of C. arvense except mean shoot height and base diameter. Herbivory by Cassida only reduced root biomass, and showed a weak additive response when combined with competition. All other measured parameters of C. arvense showed a substitutive response, with competition being the only factor having a significant impact on the weed. There were no significant synergistic interactions with competition and herbivory on C. arvense. Interestingly, the number of root buds per plant was significantly greater in the presence of herbivory by Cassida, suggesting that C. arvense may compensate for defoliation. Similar to the potted-plant experiment, Cassida had no significant effect on shoot growth and development in the field-release experiment. The results of this study indicate that competition from typical NZ pasture species is a more important factor than herbivory by Cassida, and unless Cassida reaches outbreak densities, it will likely have an insignificant impact on this weed.
Acknowledgements
We are particularly grateful for the advice and assistance of Hugh Gourlay for rearing of Cassida beetles. We thank Madalin Parepa for assistance with the garden experiment. We are also thankful for the comments of two anonymous reviewers that improved the quality of this paper. This research was funded by the Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, New Zealand.