267
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Metarhizium anisopliae formulations against dengue vectors under laboratory and field conditions

, &
Pages 386-401 | Received 23 Sep 2015, Accepted 18 Nov 2015, Published online: 11 Jan 2016
 

ABSTRACT

The oviposition behaviour of Aedes aegypti and the effectiveness of Metarhizium anisopliae conidia formulated in water or oil-in-water against A. aegypti adults and eggs were tested in multi-choice and no-choice tests in oviposition devices under laboratory conditions. Both females and males rested in the devices, regardless of the formulation, and were not repelled by the presence of conidia (up to 106 conidia/cm2) without oil or formulated with oil on treated filter paper arranged in the device. However, at higher oil concentrations (≥0.1 μl/cm2), regardless of the presence of conidia, the number of eggs laid by gravid females on the filter paper dropped. The susceptibility of adults, especially of males, to fungal infection increased up to a 15-day incubation. An elevated number of larvae (≥41%) eclosed from eggs laid on the moistened filter paper in the device even without submersion of eggs in water, and these larvae subsequently died. In the laboratory, 1 μl/cm2 oil combined with 106 conidia/cm2 clearly reduced eclosion to 1.8% after submersion of eggs in water compared to ≥13% eclosion in the control. In field tests in Goiânia, Brazil, eclosion of aedine larvae from eggs laid on filter paper previously treated with oil-in-water formulated conidia dropped to between 0% and 36% compared to 22–50% in the control. Promising results of laboratory and field tests with M. anisopliae formulated in water or oil-in-water and tested in a device emphasised the effectiveness of a fungus-based formulation for aedine mosquitoes in peridomestic areas.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Welington T. Rocha (SMS-GO) facilitating the field studies, and Richard A. Humber (USDA-ARS, Ithaca, NY) for the critical review of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a grant awarded by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil) to LSL.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 676.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.