ABSTRACT
Plant resistance factors, such as secondary metabolites and proteins, are known to affect the viability of insect fungal pathogens. Different plant varieties can have different levels of plant pathogen resistance, which could potentially influence efficacy of insect pathogens. Leaves from twelve maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds with different reported resistance to Fusarium and/or Aspergillus pathogens were examined for their influence on the efficacy of two different commercial strains of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. against corn earworms, Helicovepa zea (Boddie) and fall armyworms, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith). For leaf assays with first instar caterpillars, mortality on day 2 ranged from an inbred dependent high of 92% to a low of 14% for corn earworms, and from a high of 84% to a low of 22% for fall armyworms. Leaves that caused the greatest inhibition of B. bassiana efficacy had the greatest amount of caterpillar damage compared to corresponding control leaves that were not treated with B. bassiana. Damage ratings due to Fusarium graminearum (Schwabe) infection were often correlated with the mortality levels of both species of B. bassiana treated caterpillars that fed on leaves, suggesting that maize resistance factors to F. graminearum were interfering with the efficacy of B. bassiana. The study suggests that the interaction between plant pathogen resistance factors and insect pathogens should be considered when developing both new plant varieties and biocontrol strains that may be used for insect pest management where possible.
Acknowledgements
We thank DG White, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL (retired); WP Williams USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Mississippi State MS; USDA, Agricultural Research Service, North Central Regional Plant Introduction Center for supplying maize inbred seed; M. Doehring and D. Lee for technical assistance; and R. W. Behle, F. E. Vega, and T. J. Ward for their comments on earlier drafts.
Disclaimer
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).