Avoiding pitfalls and realizing potentials: researching redundancy regulation in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Japan

Abstract

This paper attempts to explore the theoretical and practical implications of conducting comparative research in the realm of legal science. The endeavour is based on experiences gained from engaging in such activities as part of a research project in labour law. In order to allow for a critical evaluation of ways in which to regulate redundancy, the study mentioned sets Swedish collective agreements on employment security against British redundancy pay legislation and the Japanese Employment Stabilizations Fund system. The paper discusses the pitfalls and potentials of the chosen approach and presents some tentative conclusions regarding its benefits.

Keywords:

• yet to come

Notes

Gabriella Sebardt, Department of Law, Stockholm University, Sweden (e-mail: [email protected]).