1,900
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Beyond managerial talent: ‘key group’ identification and differential compensation practices in multinational companies

, , &
Pages 1299-1318 | Published online: 22 Oct 2015
 

Abstract

With the maturation of strategic human resource management scholarship, there appears to be a greater call to move from monolithic workforce management to a more strategic and differentiated emphasis on employees with the greatest capacity to enhance competitive advantage. There has been little consideration in the literature as to whether organizations formally identify key groups of employees based on their impact on organizational learning and core competences. Using survey evidence from 260 multinational companies (MNCs), this paper explores the extent to which key groups of employees are formally recognized and whether they are subject to differential compensation practices. The results demonstrate that just in excess of half of these MNCs identify a key group. There was considerable differentiation in the compensation practices between these key groups, managers and the largest occupational group in the workforce. The results give rise to questions worthy of future investigation, namely whether the differentiated approaches used lead to improved performance outcomes.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. We also used chi-square tests to assess whether having one vs. having more than one key group differs depending on the characteristics of the firm (country of origin, size and sector) and the answer was again, No. As such, we can safely conclude that there is no difference in either the composition of the companies having one or more than one key group nor is there any difference in the treatment of these groups in terms of compensation practices.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the European Commission’s Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme [FP7 IRSES-GA-2008-230854 INTREPID]; the Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences and Labour Relations Commission.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 352.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.