Multi-level gaps: a study of intended, actual and experienced human resource practices in a hypermarket chain in India

Abstract

Multi-level (Multi-level in this paper refers to three levels- intended, actual and experienced- at which HR practices are theorised in the existing strategic human resource management process research) gaps in human resource (HR) practices have not been extensively investigated in the HR literature. Using a multiple embedded case study design within a multi-unit hypermarket chain in India, we identify ‘Intended-Actual-Experienced’ gaps across nine HR practices in seven retail units. We find that these gaps arise from implementers’ adaptation of HR practices due to different understandings of the intent of HR practices, the importance given to their contents and the processes adopted in their implementation. We propose an inductive model for emergence of multi-level gaps in HR practices. Our model depicts the processes and variables that have the potential to enable or disable adaptation, delivery and experience of HR practices, thus creating gaps between intended and experienced HR practices. This paper highlights the need for further research on HR implementation with particular focus on gaps. It also provides a framework for practitioners to take cognisance of the gaps that could impact implementation and experience of corporate-driven HR practices.

Keywords:

• Adaptation of HR practices
• case study
• human resource practices
• inductive model
• multi-level gaps

Acknowledgements

We thank the editors and reviewers for their candid critique and invaluable suggestions, which led us to revise our original manuscript in significant ways. We credit them with critical contributions to the present form of this paper. We also acknowledge the support of the members of the hypermarket chain for making this study possible. Special thanks to the VP-HR of the organisation for sparing his time and providing constant guidance throughout this study.

Notes

1. We thank the editors and reviewers for suggesting that we clarify, early on, the multi-level perspective used in this paper, as this differs from the nesting perspective of levels, which is used in a limited manner in our study.

2. We thank the reviewer for making us include a brief description of the Indian retail sector.