Comparison of composted biosolid substrate for containerized turfgrass production

Abstract

Composts produced from composting municipal sewage sludge with bulking agent, namely hazelnut husk (HH), pine litter (PL), corn straw (CS) and sawdust (SW), were seeded with turfgrass mix and cultivated in a container to compare the suitability of composted substrates to produce turfgrass in greenhouse conditions. The performance of substrate was determined by both substrate properties compared to standard peat and by measuring plant growth parameters on each substrate during turfgrass sod establishment. In general, the physico-chemical properties of all substrates were satisfactory for container substrates, but HH and PL substrates performed better in plant growth parameters than in SW and CS composts. The comprehensive growth index values obtained for plants growing in peat, HH and PL were 0.94, 0.87 and 0.84, respectively, which were higher than those in the CS and SW. Plant growth showed linear above-ground dry matter accumulation in all substrates, but was slower in SW and CS. HH and PL substrates appeared to be suitable for containerized sod production for natural soil and peat substitution. Biosolid proved to be an efficient component as a nutrient source ingredient of composted substrates for turfgrass.

Keywords:

• biosolid compost
• container substrate
• turf grass
• soil and peat substitution

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.