ABSTRACT
Using Canadian (CMZ), Bear River (BRZ), and St. Cloud (SCZ) zeolites, this study investigates the application of natural and pre-treated zeolites for Na+ removal from salinised groundwater. Natural BRZ achieved better Na+ removal for initial concentrations of 250–10,000 mg Na+/L and had the highest maximum adsorption capacity (14.3 ± 0.4 mg/g) compared to natural CMZ (5.8 ± 0.5 mg/g) and SCZ (5.6 ± 0.7 mg/g). Natural BRZ exhibited a higher cation exchange capacity (CEC), mineralogical purity, and natural abundance of exchangeable calcium. The natural abundance of Na+ on CMZ and SCZ may have reduced Na+ adsorption. H-form BRZ and H-form CMZ were also prepared through conventional acidic pre-treatment. Acid treatment improved zeolite properties for adsorption (surface area and CEC). Synchrotron-based X-ray scanning transmission microscopy (STXM) indicated that Na+ adsorption sites in the H-form zeolites were associated with the mineral framework. However, sorption effluents were highly acidic (pH ∼2) and Al3+ leached significantly due to the dealumination induced by acid treatment. Alternatively, hard water softening was cyclically integrated with sodium adsorption as a zeolite treatment to generate Ca/Mg-form CMZ. This integration suggested the feasibility of combining CMZ cycles for water softening and sodium reduction for an extended CMZ lifecycle. Natural CMZ was first used to treat hard water, which enriched the CMZ with Ca2+ and Mg2+ and increased its subsequent Na+ removal rate by over 77%, without producing acidic effluents. The Canadian zeolite adsorbed more sodium when water softening was integrated with sodium removal, which is a repeatable dual-treatment.
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
![](/cms/asset/d5f54622-56df-43c4-b649-2734d0f3cd6b/tent_a_1721567_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Nutrien, The Mosaic Company, the International Minerals Innovation Institute (IMII) (#1922879), a Mitacs Accelerate Cluster Grant (IT04529), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (CRDPJ 487008-15). The research was also supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) (JELF#33982) and an NSERC Discovery Grant (NSERC; RGPIN 05902-2014).
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).