Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 36, 2020 - Issue 3
301
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Report

Deficits in motor coordination of the paretic lower limb best explained activity limitations after stroke

, PT, PhD, , PT, PhD, , PT, PhD, , PT, MSc, , PT, PhD, , PT, PhDORCID Icon, , PT, PhD & , PT, PhD show all
Pages 417-423 | Received 19 Jan 2018, Accepted 06 May 2018, Published online: 21 Jun 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore the relationships between selected measures of motor impairments and activities involving the lower-limbs in ambulatory people with chronic stroke. Design: Motor impairment measures included maximal isometric strength and motor coordination. Activity measures included walking speed, stair ascent/descent cadences, and the time to perform the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Results: Ninety individuals were included. The correlations between all motor impairment and activity measures were significant (0.18 < < 0.52, < 0.05). Motor coordination and strength of the knee flexor muscles explained 30% (F = 20.3; < 0.001) of the variance in walking speed, 32% (F = 19.1; < 0.001) of stair ascent, and 31% (F = 16.8; < 0.001) of stair descent cadence. Regarding the TUG, only motor coordination reached significance and explained 13% (F = 13.4; < 0.001) of the variance. Conclusion: Measures of strength and motor coordination of the paretic lower limb were significantly correlated with all activity measures. However, despite the fact that knee flexor strength explained some variance in walking speed and stair ascent/descent cadences, motor coordination was the only measure that explained the variances in all three selected activity measures. These findings are innovative for neurological rehabilitation, since this is the first study to demonstrate that deficits in motor coordination of the paretic lower limb best explained limitations in performing different lower-limb activities.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the CNPq [grant number 304430/2014-0], and FAPEMIG [grant number PPM 00082-16].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.