Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 38, 2022 - Issue 13
545
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of manual therapy in patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 2368-2377 | Received 09 Oct 2020, Accepted 03 Apr 2021, Published online: 01 Jun 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Background

The effectiveness of Manual Therapy (MT) in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of MT for functional outcomes in patients with thumb carpometacarpal OA.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Methods

An electronic search was performed in the Medline, Central, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, Cinahl, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies included randomized clinical trials that compared MT versus other interventions in functional outcomes, such as thumb and/or hand function questionnaires, pinch and/or grip strength, thumb and/or hand range of motion, and pain intensity or pressure pain threshold in patients with thumb carpometacarpal OA.

Results

Five clinical trials met the eligibility criteria; for the quantitative synthesis, four studies were included. The mean difference (MD) for grip strength was 0.87kg (95% CI = 0.29–1.44, p = .003), for pinch strength was 0.10kg (95% CI = –0.01–0.20, p = .06), and for the pressure pain threshold was 0.64kg/cm2 (95% CI = 0.07–1.20, p = .03). All differences were in favor of the MT group.

Conclusions

In the short-term, there was moderate to high evidence, with statistically significant differences in the functional outcomes, in favor of MT versus sham interventions in patients with thumb carpometacarpal OA. However, these differences are not clinically important.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential competing interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.