Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 39, 2023 - Issue 8
408
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Qualitative Research Reports

Conceptions of disability among physiotherapists: an exploratory qualitative study

, MSc, PT, , PhDORCID Icon, , MSc & , PhD, PTORCID Icon
Pages 1662-1671 | Received 02 Sep 2021, Accepted 19 Jan 2022, Published online: 27 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Physiotherapists’ (PTs) assumptions about disability, for the most part unrecognized and unquestioned, may or may not be aligned with the vision of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). They can influence a wide range of PT practices and impact the lives of patients.

Objective

To investigate whether PTs at different stages of their training rely on medical, social, or biopsychosocial conceptions of disability in line with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Methods

A qualitative study with three focus groups: 1) PT students at the beginning; and 2) at the end of their training; and 3) PTs active in several different clinical fields. Content analysis was used identify definitions, causes, judgments, and solutions to disability.

Results

Some clinicians and senior students expressed views of functioning and disability as interactive, situational, continuous, and ubiquitous features of the human condition. However, in all groups there was a strong predominance of medical definitions and causal attributions for disability, some fitting the tripartite linear causal logic from impairment to subnormal performance to social disadvantage. Most of moral judgments were negative and associated disability with a ‘diminished state,’ personal loss, and suffering. Surprisingly, most solutions to disability-related problems were of a social or interactionist character, including vigilance against ableism.

Conclusions

Results revealed paradoxical conceptions and point to challenges of ensuring a deeper understanding of non-medical framings, to avoid an uncritical adoption of the ICF that may neutralize its potential to challenge culturally entrenched medical conceptions of disability.

Acknowledgments

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nıvel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001, Ministério da Educação do Brasil.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) – [Finance Code 001].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.