0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report

An exploration of the relationship between grit, reflection-in-learning, and academic performance in entry-level doctor of physical therapy students

, PT,PhD, , PT, DPT & , PT, DPT, ScD
Received 29 Feb 2024, Accepted 11 Jun 2024, Published online: 16 Jun 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Recent literature in physical therapy education suggests learners’ non-cognitive skills, such as grit and reflection, may be predictors of success. Little is known about the relationship of these constructs to each other or success during the first year of entry level physical therapist education.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between Reflection-In- Learning Scale (RLS), grit, and grade point average (GPA) of entry-level physical therapy students during the first year of didactic instruction.

Methods

One hundred and fourteen entry-level doctor of physical therapy students enrolled in a private university completed the original 12-item Grit Scale (Grit 1) and the RLS (RLS 1) during the first term and again at the end of the third trimester (Grit 2 and RLS 2).

Results

The relationship between Grit 1 and RLS 1 demonstrated a fair, positive, significant correlation (r = .380, p < .001). No relationship was found between Grit 1 and GPA (r = .066, p = .485), or Grit 2 and GPA (r = .064, p = .500), or between RLS 1 and GPA (r = .017, p = .857), or RLS 2 and GPA (r = .171, p = .069). Fifty-three percent of students demonstrated a decrease in grit and 56% decreased RLS scores at the end of the first year of the program.

Conclusion

The fair correlation between these variables indicates they may measure different constructs. Findings suggest that doctor of physical therapy programs should be cautious when using these non-cognitive factors in making admission decisions. Future research should explore changes in grit and RLS throughout the curricula and impact on student success.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.