86
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report

The reliability and minimal detectable change of common tests and measures for temporomandibular disorders

, PT, DPT, , PT, DPT, EdD, , DPT, , DPT, , DPT & , PT, PhD
Received 20 Apr 2024, Accepted 26 Jun 2024, Published online: 09 Jul 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Temporomandibular disorders are a source of orofacial pain. Understanding clinimetric properties of evaluation procedures is necessary for assessing impairments and determining response to interventions.

Purpose

Reliability, minimal detectable change (MDC95), and 95% limits of agreement of TMJ examination procedures were investigated.

Methods

Occlusion (central incisor alignment, overjet, overbite), mandibular dynamics (maximal incisor opening, laterotrusion, protrusion active range of motion (AROM)), auscultation, tenderness, and joint play were measured on 50 asymptomatic adults (30 females), mean age 24.8. The inter-rater reliability assessment used an intra-session design. Participants returned 24–48 h later for intra-rater assessments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Kappa values were used to determine reproducibility.

Results

Intra-rater reliability for occlusion and AROM was ICC 3,1 ≥ 0.75, whereas interrater reliability was ICC 2,1 ≥ 0.68. Kappa values for inter-rater agreement of joint mobility was K = .18, whereas auscultation and palpation were K ≥ 0.48. Intra-rater Kappa values were ≥ 0.24, with lateral pterygoid region palpation having poor agreement. The MDC95 for occlusion was 1 mm, whereas AROM ranged from 3 to 6 mm. Mean AROM differences between raters were −1.16, −0.42, −0.18, and −0.8 mm for maximal incisor opening, left and right laterotrusion, and protrusion, respectively.

Conclusion

AROM and occlusion measurements may be used with confidence; however, poor agreement for joint mobility measurements and lateral pterygoid region palpation must be recognized. When re-assessing measurements, a 3–6 and 1-mm change in AROM and occlusion, respectively, is required to be 95% certain change is not due to error. Future symptomatic population research is needed (250/250).

View correction statement:
Correction

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Correction Statement

This article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version. Please see Correction (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2381352)

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported that there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.