ABSTRACT
This article discusses the relationship between, on the one hand, the academic study of Islamic disciplines within university faculties of humanities and theology, including religious studies, and, on the other, ‘lived Islamic theology’, i.e. the diverse Islamic institutional discourses that inform individuals’ religious knowledge and practices. Here, ‘lived Islamic theology’ refers to research from the Norwegian cities of Trondheim and Oslo. The analytical model is Michel de Certeau’s, Pierre Bourdieu’s and Jürgen Habermas’s concepts of discourse and ‘capital’. We argue that the academic study of Islamic disciplines is a prerequisite for accurate public knowledge about ‘lived Islamic theology’; that it potentially increases the ‘cultural capital’ assigned to Islamic knowledge in the public sphere, and thereby enables citizens to contribute to the common good through Islam; and that it can enrich the humanities by showing how Islamic disciplines correlate with ‘Western’ philosophical, hermeneutical, ethical, linguistic, political and historical disciplines.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1 See Mårtensson (Citation2015, 7–15) for application of de Certeau’s analytical model to al-Tabari’s historiography in The History of the Messengers and the Kings (Taʾrīkh al-rusul wa-al-mulūk); on comparisons of al-Tabari’s hermeneutics with modern counterparts, see Heath (Citation1989); Mårtensson (Citation2008, Citation2009).
2 On the politics of the doctrinal and exegetical debate over the nature of the Qur’an between ahl al-ḥadīth and the Muʿtazila, see Carter (Citation1983, 68); Cooperson (Citation2000, 28–32); Vasalou (Citation2002, 25).
4 A recent important study of uṣul al-fiqh as hermeneutics is Vishanoff (Citation2011); see also Schwarb (Citation2007).
5 On the rhetorical character of Arabic according to the ‘founding father’of classical linguistics, Sibawayhi, see Marogy (Citation2010); Baalbaki (Citation2007); Carter (Citation2007). This theory of language and meaning as context-dependent is also reflected in the exegetical genres wujūh and ashbāh; see Rippin (Citation1988).
6 On the emergence of Islamic humanism and imperial law in the reign of the ʿAbbasid Caliph Hārūn al-Rashīd (r. 786–809), and in a relationship with Byzantine and Carolingian legal and scholarly culture, with the Islamic contribution at least as constructively contributing as the others, if not more, see Jokisch (Citation2007, 67–71).
8 Arabic: la-inna al-mukhāṭab wa-al-mursal ilayhi in lam yafham mā khūṭiba bihi wa-ursila bihi ilayhi fa-ḥāluhu qabla al-khiṭāb wa-qabla majīʾ al-risāla ilayhi wa-baʿdahu siwāʾ idh lam yafidhu al-khiṭāb shayʾan […] wa-Allāhu julla dhikruhu yataʿāla ʿan an yukhāṭiba khiṭāban aw yursila risālatan lā tūjabu fāʾidatan li-man khūṭabu aw ursalu ilayhi; al-Ṭabarī (Citation1995, vol. 1:1, 18–19); see Mårtensson (Citation2016, 19).
Mårtensson, Ulrika. 2015. The True New Testament: Sealing the Heart’s Covenant in al-Tabari’s History of the Messengers and the Kings. Saarbrücken: GlobeEdit. Heath, Peter. 1989. “Creative Hermeneutics: A Comparative Analysis of Three Islamic Approaches.” Arabica 36 (2): 173–210. doi: 10.1163/157005889X00043 Mårtensson, Ulrika. 2008. “‘The Persuasive Proof’: A Study of Aristotle’s Politics and Rhetoric in the Qur’an and in al-Ṭabarī’s Commentary.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 34: 363–420. Mårtensson, Ulrika. 2009. “Through the Lens of Modern Hermeneutics: Authorial Intention in al-Ṭabarī’s and al-Ghazzālî’s Interpretations of Q. 24:35.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 11 (2): 20–48. doi: 10.3366/jqs.2009.0003 Carter, Michael. 1983. “Language Control as People Control in Medieval Islam: The Aims of the Grammarians in Their Cultural Context.” al-Abḥath 31: 76–84. Cooperson, Michael. 2000. Classical Arabic Biography: The Heirs of the Prophets in the Age of al-Maʾmūn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vasalou, Sophia. 2002. “The Miraculous Eloquence of the Qur’an: General Trajectories and Individual Approaches.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 4 (2): 23–53. doi: 10.3366/jqs.2002.4.2.23 Makdisi, George. 1990. Religion, Law and Learning in Classical Islam. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum. van Ess, Josef. 1990–1997. Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra: eine Geschichte des religiösen Denkens im frühen Islam. 6 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter. van Ess, Josef. 1990–1997. Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra: eine Geschichte des religiösen Denkens im frühen Islam. 6 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter. Jokisch, Benjamin. 2007. Islamic Imperial Law. Berlin: de Gruyter. Vishanoff, David. 2011. The Formation of Islamic Hermeneutics: How Sunni Legal Theorists Imagined a Revealed Law. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society. Schwarb, Gregor. 2007. “Capturing the Meanings of God’s Speech: The Relevance of Usul al-Fiqh to an Understanding of Usul al-Tafsīr in Jewish and Muslim Kalam.” In A Word Fitly Spoken: Studies in Medieval Exegesis of the Hebrew Bible and the Qur’an Presented to Haggai Ben-Shammai, edited by Meir M. Bar-Asher, Simon Hopkins, Sarah Stroumsa and Bruno Chiesa, 111–156. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute. Marogy, Amal E. 2010. Kitāb Sībawayhi: Syntax and Pragmatics. Leiden: Brill. Baalbaki, Ramzi. 2007. “Inside the Speaker’s Mind: Speaker’s Awareness as Arbiter of Usage in Arab Grammatical Theory.” In Approaches to Arabic Linguistics, edited by E. Ditters, and H. Motzki, 3–23. Leiden: Brill. Carter, Michael. 2007. “Pragmatics and Contractual Language in Early Arabic Grammar and Legal Theory.” In Approaches to Arabic Linguistics, edited by E. Ditters, and H. Motzki, 25–44. Leiden: Brill. Rippin, Andrew. 1988. “Lexicograpical Texts and the Qur’an.” In Approaches to the History of the Interpretation of the Qur’ān, edited by A. Rippin, 158–174. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Jokisch, Benjamin. 2007. Islamic Imperial Law. Berlin: de Gruyter. Abu Zayd, Nasr Hamid. 2004. Rethinking the Qur’an: Towards a Humanistic Hermeneutics. Utrecht: Utrecht University Press. Abu Zayd, Nasr Hamid. 2006. Reformation of Islamic Thought: A Critical Historical Analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Arkoun, Mohammed. 1988. The Concept of Revelation: From the People of the Book to the Societies of the Book. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University. Arkoun, Mohammed. 1994. Rethinking Islam: Common Questions, Uncommon Answers. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Arkoun, Mohammed. 2002. The Unthought in Contemporary Islamic Thought. London: Saqi. Arkoun, Mohammed. 2006. Islam: To Reform or to Subvert. London: Saqi. Charfi, Abdelmajid. 2004. L’Islam entre le message et l’histoire. Paris: Albin Michel. Soroush, Abdolkarim. 2000. Reason, Freedom & Democracy in Islam: Essential Writings of Abdolkarim Soroush. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Amirpour, Katayun. 2011. “The Expansion of the Prophetic Experience: Abdolkarim Soroush’s New Approach to Qur’anic Revelation.” Die Welt des Islams 51: 409–437. doi: 10.1163/157006011X603514 al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad b. Jarīr. 1995. Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān, Edited by Ṣidqī al-ʿAṭṭār. 15 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. Mårtensson, Ulrika. 2016. “Al-Tabari’s Concept of the Qur’an: A Systemic Analysis.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 18 (2): 9–57. doi: 10.3366/jqs.2016.0238