8,692
Views
57
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Communications

Digital contact-tracing adoption in the COVID-19 pandemic: IT governance for collective action at the societal level

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 731-745 | Received 16 May 2020, Accepted 02 Sep 2020, Published online: 23 Sep 2020
 

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for rapid, population-wide digital contact tracing. One solution, Bluetooth-enabled digital proximity tracing using smartphones, promises to preserve individual privacy while helping to contain society-wide viral outbreaks. However, this digital solution works effectively only if adopted by the majority of the population. This poses a collective action problem: everyone would benefit from wide-spread proximity tracing, but the benefits for the individual are indirect and limited. To facilitate such collective action at the societal level, this paper conceptualises the option space of IT governance actions for proximity tracing adoption along two dimensions: decision-making entities (who will govern the roll-out) and accountability enforcement (how strictly will adoption and use be enforced). Examining coherent governance approaches that arise from the framework, we show that there are no globally ideal approaches but only locally contextualised ones that depend on immediate health risk, prior experience with pandemics, societal values and national culture, role of government, trust in government and trust in technology in each society. The paper contributes specific propositions for governing digital contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic and general theoretical implications for IT governance for collective action at the societal level.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Editors of the EJIS Special Communications on IS in the Age of Pandemics for a fast and constructive review process. We also thank the Sydney Business Insights team and members of the Digital Disruption Research Group for their ideas and input to the research, and Alexander Richter, Daniel Reker, and Christoph Müller-Bloch for helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 337.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.