300
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Eyetracking during picture naming predicts future vocabulary dropout in progressive anomia

, &
Pages 560-578 | Received 19 Nov 2019, Accepted 02 Oct 2020, Published online: 28 Oct 2020
 

ABSTRACT

The dynamic and unpredictable nature of expressive vocabulary dropout in progressive anomia presents a challenge for language intervention. We evaluated whether eye gaze patterns during naming could predict anomia for the same items in the near future. We tracked naming accuracy and gaze patterns as patients with semantic (n = 7) or logopenic (n = 2) variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia or amnestic Alzheimer’s Disease (n = 1), named photographs of people and objects. Patients were tested three or more times spaced roughly evenly over an average duration of 19.1 months. Target words named accurately at baseline were retrospectively coded as either known (i.e., consistently named) or vulnerable (i.e., inaccurately or inconsistently named) based on naming accuracy over the study interval. We extracted gaze data corresponding to successful naming attempts and implemented logistic mixed effects models to determine whether common gaze measures could predict each word’s naming status as known or vulnerable. More visual fixations and greater visual fixation dispersion predicted later anomia. These findings suggest that eye tracking may yield a biomarker of the robustness of particular target words to future expressive vocabulary dropout. We discuss the potential utility of this finding for optimizing treatment for progressive anomia.

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients, their families, and the University of Pennsylvania FTD Center for supporting this research. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their care, encouragement, and dedication to helping us create something we are truly proud of.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Fixations are defined as periods of focused visual attention within a particular area of interest. The threshold of what constitutes a fixation vary across eyetracking systems. The eyetracker used here (SMI Red-M 120 Hz) delineates fixation as dwell time exceeding a duration of 80ms within a spatially disbursed area subtending no more than 2 degrees of visual angle (100 pixels).

2 Numerous case studies have highlighted altered higher level visual processing in PPA and AD, including changes in stylistic preferences for visual art (Baddeley et al., Citation2001; Green & Patterson, Citation2009; Miller & Miller, Citation2013; Perry & Hodges, Citation1999; Rizzo et al., Citation2000; Vernet et al., Citation2014; Viskontas et al., Citation2011).

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the US National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD/NIH) [Grant Number: DC013063].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 375.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.