Notes
1In Idealism: Past and Present ed. by G. Vesey, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp.19–50.
2Ibid., p. 19.
3Ibid., p. 50.
4 The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, vol. 5, ed. by A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop, (London: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd, 1953), §311, p. 143.
5Ibid., p. 50.
6R. Sorabji, Matter, Space, and Motion, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988); Time, Creation and the Continuum, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983).
7Sorabji (1983), p. 288.
8Sorabji does not dispute Burnyeat's critique of Berkeley's interpretation of Plato and Aristotle. I agree with Burnyeat that Berkeley misunderstood Plato and Aristotle on the status of material bodies.
9See sections 151–83 of the Theaetetus for an explanation and critique of the theory.
10Burnyeat, p. 20.
11Ibid.
12Ibid., p. 29.
13Ibid.
14Ibid. pp. 43–4.
15Ibid., pp. 44–5.
16Ibid., p. 46.
17Ibid., p. 19.
18Sorabji (1983), p. 288.
19Ibid., p. 287.
20Ibid, p. 290.
21Ibid.? Sorabji (trans.) In hexaemeron, ibid., p. 290.
22Ibid., De Anima et Resurrectione, trans. by Sorabji, ibid., p. 291.
23Ibid., De Hominis Opificio, trans. by Sorabji, ibid., p. 291.
24Sorabji (1988), p. 55.
25Sorabji (1983), pp. 292–3.
26Ibid., p. 292.
27Ibid.
28Ibid.
29Ibid., p. 291.
30Ibid., p. 293.
31Ibid.
32Ibid.
33Ibid., p. 287.
34Ibid., pp. 292–3.
35Ibid.
36Ibid.
37See sections 16–24 and 67–84.
38See Dialogue 2, passim.