Notes
For a defence of the IMF, see Fischer (Citation1998).
The IMF responded with an article by the Director of the Office of External Relations, Shailendra J. Anjaria (Citation1998).
The video recording of the Stiglitz–Rogoff debate can be viewed at http://www.worldbank. org/wbi/B‐SPAN/sub_stiglitz.htm. Some opinions on the debate can be found in Crook (Citation2002a, Citation2002b) and The Economist(Citation2002b).
Reported in Le Nouvel Observateur No. 1975, 12 September 2002.
This paper was written before the Cancúun Summit, which ended in deep disagreement over these very issues.
Similar conclusions are reached by some contributors to Jan Joost Teunissen and Age Akkerman (Citation2003).
Calling for reforms in the areas of competition, investment, transparency in government procurement, and trade facilitation, the Singapore issues were of particular interest to Canada, the EU, and Japan, who insisted they would not make concessions on agriculture if developing countries did not improve the access of foreign businesses to their internal markets.
While the Make Trade Fair Campaign is an OI‐wide campaign, for the purposes of this interview no distinction has been drawn between OGB and OI and the term ‘Oxfam’ will be used from this point on.
For more information on the campaign, see www.maketradefair.org (accessed 25 October 2003).