Abstract
During the past years, combating truancy has been high on the political agenda. However, throughout Europe one can observe that despite the numerous action plans and anti-truancy measures, truancy rates continue to rise. In this article, we focus on Flanders (the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) as a case study to get a better grip on the mismatch between the general truancy policy and the everyday reality of truancy. Based on the analysis of (1) official registration data and 2013 survey data with pupils from grade 9–12 (N = 4189), (2) survey data from 62 principals of Flemish secondary schools and (3) 28 in-depth interviews with occasional and frequent truants, this article argues that the current emphasis on the registration with the aim of (early) detecting and intervening in truancy cases actually results in a disengagement of teachers and schools to deal with truancy in a responsive manner.
Notes
1. Other relevant factors in this context include among other things (1) an increasing number of divorces and single-parent homes, (2) increased immigrant population and (3) a better registration due to the increased salience of the truancy problem.
2. Some scholars rely on a more narrow definition by adding that (1) the absence should be intentional and/or (2) without permission from the parents. We do not follow this definition here because (1) current registration systems, policy documents, etc. use the terms truancy and unexcused absence interchangeable and (2) in practice it is often difficult to draw a strict line between truancy and non-truant absences.