120
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
TOPICAL ISSUES AND COMMENT

Doing with or doing to – what now for the probation service?

Lol Burke and Steve Collett consider the key policy drivers which have shaped probation and what the future holds following the restructuring of the Ministry of Justice

Pages 9-11 | Published online: 07 Apr 2011
 

Abstract

In January 2008, the latest organisational restructuring involving the Ministry of Justice saw NOMS split between ‘delivery’ and ‘strategy’, with responsibility for the former being assumed by the Director General of HMPS. The full implications of the latest restructuring are not yet clear, but there are concerns that the probation service as a distinctive ‘voice’ within the criminal justice system will be lost in the name of greater harmonisation with a much bigger and politically more powerful prison service. We have arrived at a critical moment in the history of the Probation Service but one that has been foreshadowed for some time by a range of politically driven imperatives. Among these, we consider that three have had and will continue to have a particular impact on probation. These are: moving centre stage, correctional drift, and modernisation.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Lol Burke

Senior Lecturer in Criminal Justice, Liverpool John Moores University and Editor of the Probation Journal

Steve Collett

Chief Officer, Cheshire Probation Area and Honorary Fellow, University of Liverpool, UK

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.