7,820
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Conference paper

Gut microbiome changes induced by a diet rich in fruits and vegetables

Pages 665-669 | Received 13 Nov 2020, Accepted 13 Nov 2020, Published online: 01 Dec 2020

Abstract

Habitual dietary intake is a major determinant of the species composition and functional output of the trillions of microorganisms residing in the human gut. Diet influences which microbes will colonise, flourish or disappear throughout life. An increase in polyphenols, oligosaccharides and fibre, which are all components found in a fruit and vegetable-rich diet, have long been associated with decreased risk of chronic diseases. Many of the benefits induced by this type of diet result from the interaction of these dietary components with the gut microbiome, where they selectively enrich specific microbial species and increase microbial diversity. Understanding the interaction of habitual dietary patterns on the gut microbiome will lead to rational dietary manipulation to improve human health through prevention and treatment of disease.

Introduction

Epidemiological studies have long demonstrated a strong association with increased fruit and vegetable consumption and decreased risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and cancer (Slavin and Lloyd Citation2012; Aune et al. Citation2017). The health promoting properties of plants go beyond the provision of basic micro- and macronutrients and are multimodal as they also contain phytochemicals that function as anti-oxidants, phytoestrogens and anti-inflammatory agents (Slavin and Lloyd Citation2012). In addition, over the last decade it has become clear that the consumption of plants has a significant influence on the gut microbiome and that plant-rich diets can induce the expansion of gut-resident microbes that are beneficial to human physiology and overall health (Klinder et al. Citation2016).

Gut microbiome

The human gut is colonised by 1013–1014 micro-organisms that includes bacteria, archaea, viruses and fungi. These micro-organisms and their human hosts have co-evolved and developed a symbiotic relationship where microbes now perform many critical host functions including nutrient (Rodionov et al. Citation2019) and drug metabolism (Wilson and Nicholson Citation2017), maintenance of mucosal barrier (Shi et al. Citation2017), immunomodulation (Zeng et al. Citation2019) and protection against pathogens (Ren et al. Citation2018). The bidirectional interactions between host and microbe have become fully integrated into human health such that dysbiosis, or microbial imbalance, results in loss of regulation of this finely tuned homeostatic system, increasing risk of intestinal inflammation (Weng et al. Citation2019), autoimmune diseases (Sorini et al. Citation2019) and neurological disorders (Tremlett et al. Citation2017). Many non-communicable diseases seen in the Western world, such as metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and obesity, are also characterised by a loss of gut microbial diversity (Konturek et al. Citation2015; Santos-Marcos et al. Citation2019).

Approximately 2,000 gut-resident bacterial species have been identified with the dominant phyla being Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria and Verrucobacteria. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes represent 90% of the gut microbiome (Arumugam et al. Citation2011; Hugon et al. Citation2015). Each individual person is colonised by roughly 160 species with large interindividual variability (Meadow et al. Citation2015). The variability is driven by host genotype, immunological responses (Hooper et al. Citation2012), use of antibiotics (Livanos et al. Citation2016), lifestyle and environment (Rothschild et al. Citation2018). Of these factors, habitual diet plays a major role in the microbial structure and activity (David et al. Citation2014).

The gut microbiome changes with age, but it is relatively stable in adulthood (Yatsunenko et al. Citation2012). However, dietary macronutrients can rapidly, within 2–4 days, induce shifts in microbial composition and function (David et al. Citation2014). These changes occur as microbes obtain energy for growth from dietary nutrients that had escaped proximal digestion and absorption. Therefore, dietary intake can influence which microbes will colonise, flourish or disappear throughout life. Studies on habitual diets demonstrated associations between dietary patterns and specific microbial communities (Wu et al. Citation2011), i.e. animal-based diets (typically called a “Western” diet with high amounts of animal fat and protein, and processed carbohydrates) induce decreased levels of beneficial species within the Firmicutes phyla and strains from the genus Prevotella; while levels of bile-tolerant, inflammation-associated Proteobacteria, such as Bilophila, and Bacteroides are increased (Turnbaugh Citation2008; Arumugam et al. Citation2011). This diet pattern also results in loss of bacterial diversity within the microbial community and is associated with various diseases including intestinal bowel disease and obesity (Le Chatelier et al. Citation2013). In contrast, plant-rich diets are associated with greater microbial diversity with a dominance of Prevotella over Bacteroides. The genus Prevotella is expanded with complex carbohydrate intake as these microbes contain specific enzymes that are capable of degrading plant fibres (Singh et al. Citation2017). A study published in 2018 by the American Gut project (AGP; http://americangut.org) used data collected from 11,336 healthy human participants and demonstrated that the number of unique plant species an individual consumes is associated with microbial diversity, more so than being defined as “vegan”. There was also an association with increased plant consumption and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) fermenters, specifically the species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and strains within the genus Oscillospira were increased with the number of plant species consumed (McDonald et al. Citation2018). Another study performed on 1,135 subjects from a Dutch population mirrored the abovementioned results showing increased microbial diversity with fruit and vegetable consumption. Interestingly, this study also found a strong association with carbohydrate consumption and decreased microbiome diversity, with a further reduction as consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, bread, beer etc. increased (Zhernakova et al. Citation2016). These studies are consistent with previous work demonstrating that plant components stimulate growth of beneficial intestinal bacterial species to promote and maintain a healthy microbial environment in large part through the fermentation of fibre to SCFAs (Tabernero et al. Citation2011; Padayachee et al. Citation2017).

Acetate, butyrate and propionate are the most abundant SCFAs and they have wide-ranging impacts on host physiology. SCFA production occurs through specialised organisms that resides in the gut and include stains such as Bacteroides, Roseburia, Bifidobacterium, Fecalibacterium, and Enterobacteria (Baxter et al. Citation2019). Butyrate is particularly important for gut health as it stimulates the production of mucin, antibacterial peptides and tight junction proteins and is an energy source for colonocytes (Rivière et al. Citation2016). These effects on gut barrier function are extremely important for health as changes in the mucosal barrier have been described in intestinal bowel disease and other inflammatory conditions (Mohajeri et al. Citation2018). Butyrate and propionate also function as signalling molecules by interacting with G-protein coupled receptors (e.g. GPR41) to signal to the enterocytes and immune cells. An additional function of SCFAs is to lower the colonic luminal pH to inhibit growth of pathogens such as Salmonella and Escherichia coli (Duncan et al. Citation2009; De Filippo et al. Citation2010).

Plant components and the gut microbiome

Plant components that have been extensively studied for their influence on the microbiome are plant -derived dietary fibre (also known as non-digestible polysaccharides) and polyphenols. Fibre is an important component of the human diet and has known health benefits including lowering cholesterol and improving blood glucose responses (Fuller et al. Citation2016). Dietary fibre as a prebiotic has specific effects on the microbial populations and its function as individual taxa have been shown to selectively metabolise discrete fibre structures (Leitch et al. Citation2007; Holscher Citation2017). Dietary fibre is comprised of both soluble and insoluble carbohydrates and includes pectin, cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose, arabinoxylan, nondigestible oligosaccharide inulin, oligofructose and resistant starch. Many of these fibre types have been shown to affect the microbiome uniquely; pectin, which make up 35% of fruit fibre cell wall, increases butyrate-producing species such as Clostridium cluster XIV (Padayachee et al. Citation2017; Bang et al. Citation2018). In a study by Baxter et al. two types of resistant starches, one from high-amylose maize seed and the other from potato tubers, and inulin, a naturally occurring polysaccharide, were compared regarding their butyrate production. The resistant starches increased butyrate, while inulin increased the relative abundance of Bifidobacteria (Baxter et al. Citation2019). Historically inulin was consumed at levels of 25–32 g/day, while the average American today only ingests 2–8 g/day. Food sources that contain inulin include wheat, bananas, garlic, onion, agave and chicory root. Studies using inulin as a prebiotic found increased Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and decreased Bilophila after inulin digestion by human volunteers (Ramirez-Farias et al. Citation2008; Dewulf et al. Citation2013; Henning et al. Citation2017). A comparison between apple pectin and inulin using a human colonic microbial anaerobic continuous-flow fermenter found that they were both effective in promoting prebiotic activity with anti-inflammatory effects, although apple pectin was three times more effective in promoting Bacteroides growth and overall microflora diversity than inulin, presumably reflecting the differing complexity of the two prebiotics (Chung et al. Citation2016). Apart from using fruit and vegetable components as prebiotics, specific beneficial bacterial species have also been used as probiotics. For example, Bifidobacteria can ferment fibre and produce the metabolites acetic acid, lactic acid, B vitamins and antibacterial molecules, making it an ideal choice for a probiotic (Holscher et al. Citation2015). In addition to fibre, polyphenols are also abundantly available in fruits and vegetables. Most polyphenols pass through the small intestine and can therefore influence the microbes residing in the large intestine. Polyphenols exist in various forms including flavanols, flavanones and anthocyanins (Ozdal et al. Citation2016). Specific bacterial strains that have the ability to process dietary polyphenols have been identified and include Eubacterium ramulus, Adlercreutiza equolifaciens and Flavonifractor plautii (Pasinetti et al. Citation2018).

In a whole food approach, Holscher et. al. demonstrated that walnut consumption at 42 g/day, increased butyrate-producing Clostridium clusters XIV and IV including, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, while lowering the relative abundance of Ruminococcus, Dorea, Oscilllo, Bifidobacteria. Walnut consumption also decreased pro-inflammatory bile acids deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid and serum LDL cholesterol (Holscher et al. Citation2018). A similar study performed with almonds (dose of 42 g/day) showed an increase in the relative amount of Lachnospira, Roseburia, and Dialister (Holscher et al. Citation2018). Also, broccoli containing both dietary fibre and glucosinolates (plant secondary metabolites) exerted a 9% decrease in Firmicutes, while causing a reciprocal increase in the phyla Bacteroidetes (Kaczmarek et al. Citation2019). Consumption of fruit/vegetable juice for 3 days followed by 14 days of habitual diet also reduced Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, with a significant increase in Bacteroidetes and Cyanobacteria (Henning et al. Citation2017). In a dietary pattern approach, a study examining the adherence to a Mediterranean diet, which is high in fruit and vegetables, and its effect on the microbiome, showed a higher Firmicutes-Bacteroidetes ratio with lower adherence to this diet. A greater presence of Bacteroidetes was associated with lower animal protein intake and adherence to the Mediterranean diet was also associated with significantly higher levels of total SCFA (Garcia-Mantrana et al. Citation2018).

Future perspectives

The past decade has revealed many of the roles the gut microbiome plays in human health. Health promoting strains such as Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia muciniphila, Lactobacillus and strains that are associated with negative health outcomes (i.e. Bacteroides and Ruminococcus) have been identified. We have also started to mechanistically understand the interaction between bacterial strains and their fermentation products; Faecalibacterium and Roseburia are capable of generating butyrate from acetate.

From a dietary point of view, the next critical step in understanding the role the microbiome plays in human health, is to identify how diet and food components alter the microbiome to generate metabolites that affect health outcomes. Changes in dietary intake, specifically changes in diet composition can induce acute alterations in the microbiome, but it is habitual diet that determines the long-term residents of the gut. Many studies have investigated isolated dietary components such as specific dietary fibre types used as prebiotics. However, understanding the effects of specific whole foods and diet patterns on the gut microbiome will lead to rational dietary manipulation to improve health through prevention and treatment of disease.

Disclosure statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  • Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto J-M, et al. 2011. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 473(7346):174–180.
  • Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, Fadnes LT, Keum NNa, Norat T, Greenwood DC, Riboli E, Vatten LJ, Tonstad S, et al. 2017. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 46(3):1029–1056.
  • Bang S-J, Kim G, Lim MY, Song E-J, Jung D-H, Kum J-S, Nam Y-D, Park C-S, Seo D-H. 2018. The influence of in vitro pectin fermentation on the human fecal microbiome. AMB Express. 8(1):98.
  • Baxter NT, Schmidt AW, Venkataraman A, Kim KS, Waldron C, Schmidt TM. 2019. Dynamics of human gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in response to dietary interventions with three fermentable fibers. MBio. 10(1):e02566-18.
  • Chung WSF, Walker AW, Louis P, Parkhill J, Vermeiren J, Bosscher D, Duncan SH, Flint HJ. 2016. Modulation of the human gut microbiota by dietary fibres occurs at the species level. BMC Biol. 14(3):3
  • De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet JB, Massart S, Collini S, Pieraccini G, Lionetti P. 2010. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 107(33):14691–14696.
  • Duncan SH, Louis P, Thomson JM, Flint HJ. 2009. The role of pH in determining the species composition of the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol. 11(8):2112–2122.
  • Dewulf EM, Cani PD, Claus SP, Fuentes S, Puylaert PGB, Neyrinck AM, Bindels LB, de Vos WM, Gibson GR, Thissen J-P, et al. 2013. Insight into the prebiotic concept: lessons from an exploratory, double blind intervention study with inulin-type fructans in obese women. Controlled Clinical Trial (Gut). 62(8):1112–11121.
  • Fuller S, Beck E, Salman H, Tapsell L. 2016. New horizons for the study of dietary fiber and health: a review. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 71(1):1–12.
  • Holscher HD, Taylor AM, Swanson KS, Novotny JA, Baer DJ. 2018. Almond consumption and processing affects the composition of the gastrointestinal microbiota of healthy adult men and women: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 10(2):126.
  • Henning SM, Yang J, Shao P, Lee R-P, Huang J, Ly A, Hsu M, Lu Q-Y, Thames G, Heber D, et al. 2017. Health benefit of vegetable/fruit juice-based diet: role of microbiome. Sci Rep. 7(1):1–9.
  • Holscher HD. 2017. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes. 8(2):172–184.
  • Holscher HD, Bauer LL, Gourineni V, Pelkman CL, Fahey GC, Swanson KS. 2015. Agave inulin supplementation affects the fecal microbiota of healthy adults participating in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. J Nutr. 145(9):2025–2032.
  • Holscher HD, Guetterman HM, Swanson KS, An R, Matthan NR, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2018. Walnut consumption alters the gastrointestinal microbiota, microbially derived secondary bile acids, and health markers in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Nutr. 148(6):862–867.
  • Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ. 2012. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science. 336(6086):1268–1273.
  • Hugon P, Dufour JC, Colson P, Fournier PE, Sallah K, Raoult D. 2015. A comprehensive repertoire of prokaryotic species identified in human beings. Lancet Infect Dis. 15(10):1211–1219.
  • Garcia-Mantrana I, Selma-Royo M, Alcantara C, Collado MC. 2018. Shifts on gut microbiota associated to mediterranean diet adherence and specific dietary intakes on general adult population. Front Microbiol. 9:890.
  • Kaczmarek JL, Liu X, Charron CS, Novotny JA, Jeffery EH, Seifried HE, Ross SA, Miller MJ, Swanson KS, Holscher HD, et al. 2019. Broccoli consumption affects the human gastrointestinal microbiota. J Nutr Biochem. 63:27–34.
  • Klinder A, Shen Q, Heppel S, Lovegrove JA, Rowland I, Tuohy KM. 2016. Impact of increasing fruit and vegetables and flavonoid intake on the human gut microbiota. Food Funct. 7(4):1788–1796.
  • Konturek PC, Haziri D, Brzozowski T, Hess T, Heyman S, Kwiecien S, et al. 2015. Emerging role of fecal microbiota therapy in the treatment of gastrointestinal and extra-gastrointestinal diseases. J Physiol Pharmacol. 66(4):486–491.
  • David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, et al. 2014. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 505(7484):559–563.
  • Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, Almeida M, Arumugam M, Batto J-M, Kennedy S, et al. 2013. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 500(7464):541–546.
  • Leitch ECMW, Walker AW, Duncan SH, Holtrop G, Flint HJ. 2007. Selective colonization of insoluble substrates by human faecal bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 9(3):667–679.
  • Livanos AE, Greiner TU, Vangay P, Pathmasiri W, Stewart D, McRitchie S, Li H, Chung J, Sohn J, Kim S, et al. 2016. Antibiotic-mediated gut microbiome perturbation accelerates development of type 1 diabetes in mice. Nat Microbiol. 1(11):16140.
  • Mohajeri MH, Brummer RJM, Rastall RA, Weersma RK, Harmsen HjM, Faas M, Eggersdorfer M. 2018. The role of the microbiome for human health: from basic science to clinical applications. Eur J Nutr. 57(Suppl 1):1–14.
  • McDonald D, Hyde E, Debelius JW, Morton JT, Gonzalez A, Ackermann G, Aksenov AA, Behsaz B, Brennan C, Chen Y, et al. 2018. American gut: an open platform for citizen science microbiome research. MSystems. 3(3):e00031-18.
  • Meadow JF, Altrichter AE, Bateman AC, Stenson J, Brown G, Green JL, Bohannan BJM. 2015. Humans differ in their personal microbial cloud. PeerJ. 3:e1258.
  • Ozdal T, Sela DA, Xiao J, Boyacioglu D, Chen F, Capanoglu E. 2016. The reciprocal interactions between polyphenols and gut microbiota and effects on bioaccessibility. Nutrients. 8(2):78.
  • Padayachee A, Day L, Howell K, Gidley MJ. 2017. Complexity and health functionality of plant cell wall fibers from fruits and vegetables. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 57(1):59–81.
  • Pasinetti GM, Singh R, Westfall S, Herman F, Faith J, Ho L. 2018. The role of the gut microbiota in the metabolism of polyphenols as characterized by gnotobiotic mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 63(2):409–421.
  • Ramirez-Farias C, Slezak K, Fuller Z, Duncan A, Holtrop G, Louis P. 2008. Effect of inulin on the human gut microbiota: stimulation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Br J Nutr. 101(4):541–550.
  • Ren D, Gong S, Shu J, Zhu J, Liu H, Chen P. 2018. Effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria on intestinal microbiota of mice infected with Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiol. 18(1):109.
  • Rivière A, Selak M, Lantin D, Leroy F, De Vuyst L. 2016. Bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing colon bacteria: importance and strategies for their stimulation in the human gut. Front Microbiol. 7:979.
  • Rodionov DA, Arzamasov AA, Khoroshkin MS, Iablokov SN, Leyn SA, Peterson SN, Novichkov PS, Osterman AL. 2019. Micronutrient requirements and sharing capabilities of the human gut microbiome. Front Microbiol. 10:1316.
  • Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, Kurilshikov A, Korem T, Zeevi D, Costea PI, Godneva A, Kalka IN, Bar N, et al. 2018. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature. 555(7695):210–215.
  • Santos-Marcos JA, Perez-Jimenez F, Camargo A. 2019. The role of diet and intestinal microbiota in the development of metabolic syndrome. J Nutr Biochem. 70:1–27.
  • Shi N, Li N, Duan X, Niu H. 2017. Interaction between the gut microbiome and mucosal immune system. Mil Med Res. 4(14):14.
  • Singh RK, Chang H-W, Yan D, Lee KM, Ucmak D, Wong K, Abrouk M, Farahnik B, Nakamura M, Zhu TH, et al. 2017. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J Transl Med. 15(1):73.
  • Slavin JL, Lloyd B. 2012. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv Nutr. 3(4):506–516.
  • Sorini C, Cosorich I, Lo Conte M, De Giorgi L, Facciotti F, Lucianò R, Rocchi M, Ferrarese R, Sanvito F, Canducci F, et al. 2019. Loss of gut barrier integrity triggers activation of islet-reactive T cells and autoimmune diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116(30):15140–15149.
  • Tabernero M, Venema K, Maathuis AJH, Saura-Calixto FD. 2011. Metabolite production during in vitro colonic fermentation of dietary fiber: analysis and comparison of two European diets. J Agric Food Chem. 59(16):8968–8975.
  • Tremlett H, Bauer KC, Appel-Cresswell S, Finlay BB, Waubant E. 2017. The gut microbiome in human neurological disease: a review. Ann Neurol. 81(3):369–382.
  • Turnbaugh PJ, Bäckhed F, Fulton L, Gordon JI. 2008. Diet-induced obesity is linked to marked but reversible alterations in the mouse distal gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 3(4):213–223.
  • Weng YJ, Gan HY, Li X, Huang Y, Li ZC, Deng HM, Chen SZ, Zhou Y, Wang LS, Han YP, et al. 2019. Correlation of diet, microbiota and metabolite networks in inflammatory bowel disease. J Dig Dis. 20(9):447–459.
  • Wilson ID, Nicholson JK. 2017. Gut microbiome interactions with drug metabolism, efficacy, and toxicity. Transl Res. 179:204–222.
  • Wu GD, Chen J, Hoffmann C, Bittinger K, Chen Y-Y, Keilbaugh SA, Bewtra M, Knights D, Walters WA, Knight R, et al. 2011. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 334(6052):105–108.
  • Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP, et al. 2012. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 486(7402):222–227.
  • Zeng W, Shen J, Bo T, Peng L, Xu H, Nasser MI, Zhuang Q, Zhao M. 2019. Cutting edge: probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation in immunomodulation. J Immunol Res. 2019:1603758.
  • Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Schirmer M, Vatanen T, Mujagic Z, Vila AV, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, et al. 2016. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science. 352(6285):565–569.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.