1,030
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

“Chipping away”: non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research

ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 49-55 | Received 28 Nov 2017, Accepted 10 Apr 2018, Published online: 30 Apr 2018
 

Abstract

Background: Collaboration between researchers who have lived experience of mental illness and services (consumer researchers) and mental health researchers without (other mental health researchers) is an emergent development in research. Inclusion of consumer perspectives is crucial to ensuring the ethics, relevancy and validity of mental health research; yet widespread and embedded consumer collaboration of this nature is known to be impeded by attitudinal and organisational factors. Limited research describes consumer researchers’ experiences of barriers. Other mental health researchers are key players in the co-production process yet there is also a paucity of research reporting their views on barriers to collaborating with consumers.

Aims: To explore other researchers’ views and experiences on partnering with consumer mental health researchers in Australia and New Zealand.

Methods: Exploratory qualitative design. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with mental health researchers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.

Results: Four themes concerning barriers to collaborating with consumers (hierarchies, status quo, not understanding, paternalism), and one theme on addressing the barriers (constantly chipping away) were identified.

Conclusions: It is suggested that multifaceted strategies for advancing collaboration with consumers are most effective. It is imperative to attend to several barriers simultaneously to redress the inherent power disparity.

Acknowledgements

Our sincere thanks to the participants who generously gave their time to describe their experiences and opinions.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

The authors acknowledge the funding provided by the University of Otago and the in-kind support provided by SYNERGY: Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, University of Canberra and ACT Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 989.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.