691
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Cognitive biases in military personnel with and without PTSD: a systematic review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 248-259 | Received 13 Feb 2020, Accepted 03 May 2020, Published online: 21 May 2020
 

Abstract

Background

Some cognitive biases, such as excessive attention to threat, are associated with PTSD. However, they may be adaptive for military personnel; attending to threat may improve safety for deployed personnel.

Aims

The extent to which military personnel with vs. without PTSD differ with respect to specific cognitive biases is currently unclear. This systematic review aimed to address this question.

Methods

PRISMA guidelines were followed. Articles were identified using a comprehensive literature search; 21 studies (with 1977 participants) were reviewed.

Results

All studies were of “moderate” or “strong” quality. Military personnel with vs. without PTSD used overgeneralised language when describing autobiographical memories and demonstrated impaired performance on a modified Stroop task. Studies using dot-probe paradigms conceptualised attentional response as a dynamic process, fluctuating between bias towards and away from threat; military personnel with vs. without PTSD demonstrated greater fluctuation. Studies using visual search tasks concluded that attentional bias in PTSD involves interference (difficulty disengaging from threat) rather than facilitation (enhanced threat detection). Finally, personnel with vs. without PTSD demonstrated interpretation bias, completing ambiguous sentences with negative rather than neutral endings.

Conclusion

The implications for military populations and recommendations for further research and clinical practice are considered.

Prospero registration

PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018092235.

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Dr Mark Steadman and Professor Shelley Channon for help with double scoring data and for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The researcher claims no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 989.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.