Abstract
Background
Individuals presenting to hospital with self-harm of high lethality or high suicidal intent are at high risk of subsequent suicide.
Aim
To examine factors associated with psychiatric admission and self-harm repetition following high-risk self-harm (HRSH).
Method
A cohort study of 324 consecutive HRSH patients was conducted across three urban hospitals (December 2014–February 2018). Information on self-harm repetition was extracted from the National Self-harm Registry Ireland. Logistic regression models examined predictors of psychiatric admission and self-harm repetition. Propensity score (PS) methods were used to address confounding.
Results
Forty percent of the cohort were admitted to a psychiatric inpatient setting. Factors associated with admission were living alone, depression, previous psychiatric admission, suicide note and uncommon self-harm methods. History of emotional, physical or sexual abuse was associated with not being admitted. Twelve-month self-harm repetition occurred in 17.3% of cases. Following inverse probability weighting according to the PS, psychiatric admission following HRSH was not associated with repetition. Predictors of repetition were recent self-harm history, young age (18–24 years) and previous psychiatric admission.
Conclusion(s)
Findings indicate that psychiatric admission following HRSH is not associated with repeated self-harm and reaffirms the consistent finding that history of self-harm and psychiatric treatment are strong predictors of repetition.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval reference numbers from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Cork University Teaching Hospitals: ECM 4 (v) 12/04/16 & ECM 3 (aaaaa) 21/06/16, and from the HSE Mid-Western Regional Hospital Research Ethics Committee: 018/16.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank those who contributed to the data collection, including Mrs Sarah Nicholson and the National Self-Harm Registry Ireland data registration officers; and to the staff of the hospitals who facilitated the data collection.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).