150
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Self reported function and disability in late life: a comparison between recurrent fallers and non-fallers

&
Pages 791-798 | Accepted 01 Jun 2008, Published online: 21 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Purpose. To compare self-reported function and disability between fallers and non-fallers.

Method. Self-reported late life function and disability (LLFDI) were evaluated among 100 elderly persons who live independently in the community in a cross sectional study. The function component evaluates difficulty in performing physical activities in upper and lower extremity and the disability component evaluates limitations in life activities and frequency in taking part in life tasks. Falls, cognitive function, berg balance test (BBS), and timed up and go (TUG) were also evaluated.

Results. Eighteen subjects reported one fall (F), 11 fell twice or more (RF) and 71 did not report retrospective fall (NF). There were significant differences in overall function of LLFDI between RF and NF (56.8 ± 5.7 vs. 63.7 ± 11.4, P = 0.04), mainly due to decreased basic lower extremity function scores (66.2 ± 8.6 vs. 75.3 ± 13.5, P = 0.03); no significant differences were found in disability component scores. RF subjects showed high to moderate correlations between overall function of LLFDI, BBS and TUG (r = 0.77, P = 0.006 and r = −0.62, P = 0.04, respectively), moderate correlation between disability limitation and BBS (r = 0.60, P = 0.05) but weaker with TUG (r = −0.38, P = 0.28). Both BBS and TUG were not correlated with disability frequency (r = −0.18, P = 0.61 and r = 0.14, P = 0.68, respectively) in RF. RF demonstrated high correlation between overall function and disability limitation (r = 0.76, P = 0.007) and low with disability frequency (r = 0.39, P = 0.23).

Conclusions. Balance function, self-reported function and disability limitation are strongly associated in RF but not related to the disability frequency, suggesting that the frequency of performing life tasks was not influenced only by functional capabilities.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.