Abstract
Aim
To describe research on outcomes associated with early Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) use, AFO use patterns, and parent and clinician perspectives on AFO use among young children with cerebral palsy.
Method
Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage method was used to conduct a scoping review. MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, PEDro, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for studies evaluating AFO use with children under the age of six years. Descriptive information was extracted and outcomes categorized according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Quality assessments were conducted to evaluate methodological rigor.
Results
Nineteen articles were included in the review; 14 focused on body functions and structures, seven on activity level outcomes and no studies addressed participation outcomes. Evaluations of the effects of AFOs on gross motor skills other than gait were limited. Overall, the body of evidence is comprised of methodologically weak studies with common threats to validity including inadequate descriptions of study protocols, AFO construction, and comparison interventions.
Conclusion
Research evaluating the effects of AFOs on age-appropriate, functional outcomes including transitional movements, floor mobility and participation in early childhood settings is needed to inform practice regarding early orthotic prescription.
Lack of rigorous evidence about the effects of AFOs in young children limits the ability of research to guide practice in pediatric rehabilitation.
More rigorous research that evaluates a broader range of age-appropriate outcomes, including those focused on participation in meaningful activities, could further inform clinical practice.
While clinicians often discuss expectations and goals with individual families, qualitative research that provides more insight into the experiences of families could guide AFO prescription and monitoring practices.
Implications for rehabilitation
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Liza Chan, the medical librarian at John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta for assisting us with the search strategy. This scoping review was completed as part of a PhD project, in the Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Dr. Pritchard-Wiart was supported by the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Training Program, the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute through the generous support of the Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation and Alberta Policy Wise for Children and Families.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.