922
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

When a patient’s choices entail risks for others: third-party risks, relational ethics, and responsibilities of rehabilitation professionals

, &
Pages 870-876 | Received 21 Dec 2018, Accepted 26 Jun 2019, Published online: 31 Jul 2019
 

Abstract

Purpose

Patients receiving rehabilitation care may act in ways that pose risks to the wellbeing of others. There are numerous situations when patients’ actions might pose risks to others, including family members, other patients, or society. For example, such risks arise if patients wish to return home to living in an apartment but risk starting a fire while cooking, or if they insist on driving but their health condition makes doing so unsafe. These situations give rise to ethical challenges, including for health professionals as they seek to promote their patient’s autonomy while minimizing risks for the patient and others.

Methods

We develop a conceptual analysis examining how relational ethics can inform understanding of rehabilitation professionals’ responsibilities in responding to third-party risk.

Results

Relational ethics foregrounds the situated, dynamic, and interdependent nature of relationships between people, and supports dialogic approaches to clarify how best to respond. We present a set of 10 questions linked to the concepts of relational autonomy and relational social justice that can contribute to ethical reflection and deliberation among providers, patients, families, and others involved.

Conclusion

Relational ethics provides a distinctive angle of view on challenging issues of third-party risk in rehabilitation care.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • Managing risk is a recurrent source of ethical challenge in rehabilitation care.

  • Risks to third parties give rise to significant ethical tensions.

  • We propose ten questions that can support a relational ethics approach for responding to situations of third-party risk.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to members of the Global Health, Ethics and Rehabilitation lab group for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Additional information

Funding

Matthew Hunt and Raphael Lencucha are supported by Research Scholar Awards from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.