871
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Identifying priorities and developing strategies for building capacity in amputation research in Canada

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 2779-2789 | Received 07 Aug 2019, Accepted 21 Jan 2020, Published online: 08 Feb 2020
 

Abstract

Background

Compared to other patient population groups, the field of amputation research in Canada lacks cohesion largely due to limited funding sources, lack of connection among research scientists, and loose ties among geographically dispersed healthcare centres, research institutes and advocacy groups. As a result, advances in clinical care are hampered and ultimately negatively influence outcomes of persons living with limb loss.

Objective

To stimulate a national strategy on advancing amputation research in Canada, a consensus-workshop was organized with an expert panel of stakeholders to identify key research priorities and potential strategies to build researcher and funding capacity in the field.

Methods

A modified Delphi approach was used to gain consensus on identifying and selecting an initial set of priorities for building research capacity in the field of amputation. This included an anonymous pre-meeting survey (N = 31 respondents) followed by an in-person consensus-workshop meeting that hosted 38 stakeholders (researchers, physiatrists, surgeons, prosthetists, occupational and physical therapists, community advocates, and people with limb loss).

Results

The top three identified research priorities were: (1) developing a national dataset; (2) obtaining health economic data to illustrate the burden of amputation to the healthcare system and to patients; and (3) improving strategies related to outcome measurement in patients with limb loss (e.g. identifying, validating, and/or developing outcome measures). Strategies for moving these priorities into action were also developed.

Conclusions

The consensus-workshop provided an initial roadmap for limb loss research in Canada, and the event served as an important catalyst for stakeholders to initiate collaborations for moving identified priorities into action. Given the increasing number of people undergoing an amputation, there needs to be a stronger Canadian collaborative approach to generate the necessary research to enhance evidence-based clinical care and policy decision-making.

    IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • Limb loss is a growing concern across North America, with lower-extremity amputations occurring due to complications arising from diabetes being a major cause.

  • To advance knowledge about limb loss and to improve clinical care for this population, stronger connections are needed across the continuum of care (acute, rehabilitation, community) and across sectors (clinical, advocacy, industry and research).

  • There are new surgical techniques, technologies, and rehabilitation approaches being explored to improve the health, mobility and community participation of people with limb loss, but further research evidence is needed to demonstrate efficacy and to better integrate them into standard clinical care.

Acknowledgements

The authors would also like to acknowledge the support Dan Blocka from Boundless Biomechanical Bracing, Mariam Botros from Wounds Canada, Betty Cheung and Adam Saporta from St. John’s Rehab Hospital at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and Shane Glasford from Sunnybrook Centre for Independent Living (SCIL) at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. As well, we would like to thank Ethan J. Mings from the Desk Consulting Group Inc. for his support in planning and facilitating the consensus-workshop. Finally, we would like to dedicate this article to Ms. Jean Kim, our patient partner, who sadly passed away prior to our consensus workshop.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this initiative was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Planning & Dissemination Grant Program [Grant# 158363].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.