Abstract
Purpose
This qualitative thematic analysis aimed to capture the experiences of children with cerebral palsy (CP) and caregivers who completed an 8-week goal-directed cycling programme, to provide insights on engagement and programme feasibility.
Methods
Children with CP (6–18 years, Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) levels II–IV) and caregivers completed semi-structured interviews at the end of the training programme. Interview transcripts were coded by two investigators and systematically organised into themes. A third investigator reviewed the final thematic map.
Results
17 interviews were conducted with 29 participants (11 children: 7–14 years). Four themes emerged: facilitators and challenges to programme engagement; perceived outcomes; the functional-electrical stimulation (FES) cycling experience; and previous cycling participation. Engagement was facilitated by the “therapist’s connection,” “cycling is fun” and “participant driven goal setting,” while “getting there” and “time off school” were identified as challenges. Participants positively linked improved physical function to greater independence. The FES-experience was “fun and challenging,” and participants had mixed feelings about electrode “stickiness.” Previous cycling participation was limited by access to adapted bikes.
Conclusions
Children with CP enjoy riding bikes. Facilitators and challenges to engagement were identified that hold practical relevance for clinicians. Environmental and personal factors should be carefully considered when developing future programs, to maximise opportunities for success.
Clinical Trial Registration Number
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry – ACTRN12617000644369p
Adapted cycling is a fun and engaging activity for young people with cerebral palsy.
Environmental and personal factors should be carefully considered when prescribing adapted or FES cycling programs to this group.
Engagement in adapted and FES-cycling programs can be facilitated by access to loan equipment, a goal-directed focus, and positive therapist–child relationship.
Participation in adapted cycling is limited by access to adapted cycling equipment.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
Acknowledgements
This study was completed as part of EA’s doctoral programme.
Ethics approval
Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the relevant human research ethics committees (HREC/17/QRCH/88; SSA/17/QRCH/145; GU2018/037).
Statement of deidentification
Statements from participants have been deidentified and pseudonyms have been used throughout the manuscript to maintain anonymity.
Disclosure statement
An FES-bike used in the intervention study was provided on loan by Restorative Therapies (RT300-SL cycle, Restorative Therapies Inc., Baltimore). The company had absolutely no input into any part of the study, including the design, recruitment, implementation, data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation. The study was conducted completely independent from Restorative Therapies.