126
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Examining the impact of physical function performance in predicting patient outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 6676-6683 | Received 10 Oct 2020, Accepted 15 Aug 2021, Published online: 29 Aug 2021
 

ABSRACT

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of physical function performance and pulmonary function on patient outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of 54 patients with MPM from 2015 to 2020 was performed. The primary objective was to assess whether physical function, as measured by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), and pulmonary function tests were predictive of postoperative patient outcomes (ventilator days, chest tube days, hospital length of stay). A secondary objective was to explore demographic and preoperative variables that best predict postoperative physical function and patient outcomes.

Results

Data include 54 patients who underwent extended pleurectomy-decortication. Preoperative ECOG was a significant predictor of postoperative patient outcomes while preoperative lung function lacked predictive ability. Preoperative ECOG was also predictive of preoperative lung function. Age on the day of surgery was the best predictor of postoperative physical function, which was significantly reduced postoperatively.

Conclusions

Preoperative physical function performance was a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. The results of our study highlight the importance of physical function in patients with MPM and support the need for early rehabilitation and further research to determine optimal rehabilitation interventions.

    IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • Preoperative physical function can predict outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

  • Physical function in patients with MPM should be carefully examined.

  • To accurately reflect patients’ abilities, patient assessment should include both patient-reported outcomes and performance-based measures.

  • Patients with MPM should receive rehabilitation early after diagnosis and throughout the continuum of care.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

Data and materials supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, SH, upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

Financial support was provided in part by the Dr Gladys E. Wadsworth Physical Therapy Research Fund from the Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science at the University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.