414
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives on Rehabilitation

Availability, content and quality of commercially available smartphone applications for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic assessment

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 7600-7609 | Received 27 Apr 2021, Accepted 07 Sep 2021, Published online: 06 Oct 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose

Explore smartphone apps that may be recommended by clinicians for the self-management of low back pain.

Methods

Prospectively registered systematic assessment of self-contained apps for self-management of low back pain on the Google Play and Apple App stores (Oceania), including ≥1 NICE low back pain and sciatica clinical guideline-recommended component and functioning without health professional input. Outcomes were quality (Mobile App Rating Scale; MARS), and self-management (Self-Management Support Checklist; SMS-14) and behaviour change potential (App Behaviour Change Scale; ABACUS).

Results

25 apps were included. The average quality of included apps was acceptable (Mean MARS score of 3.9 out of a maximum possible 5). The self-management support and behaviour change potential of included apps appeared low (mean SMS-14 score was 3.4/14; mean ABACUS score was 5.4/21). The apps showed no significant correlation between app consumer ratings and MARS scores. App quality was significantly correlated with app price (p = 0.049) but not consumer ratings, however, these findings were based on a small number of studies and the overall model was not significant.

Conclusions

Smartphone apps for the self-management of low back pain are of average to good quality, with questionable potential for self-management and behaviour change. Clinicians should consider that few apps were designed to specifically incorporate self-management support and behaviour change potential when recommending apps to clients. Further development in these areas of app design would be of benefit.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Smartphone apps have the potential to improve LBP self-management outcomes, however, apps are not well regulated and the quality of information and advice provided is often low quality.

  • The findings from this systematic assessment indicate that LBP self-management apps have limited self-management support and behaviour change potential features.

  • Recommendation of current smartphone apps for LBP should take into consideration that although apps are of acceptable quality they are not specifically designed with self-management support and behaviour change principles.

  • App quality does not appear to be associated with consumer ratings, however, there may be a positive association between app price and quality which requires further investigation.

Disclosure statement

This manuscript is a component of a chapter which contributes to the first author’s PhD thesis which is not yet submitted.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for app purchases was provided by the Flinders University Research Student Maintenance (RSM) support.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.