Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the effects of whole-body vibration training (WBVT) on the recovery of lower limb function in people with stroke.
Methods
The literature search was made in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase electronic databases. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Data extraction, quality assessment and meta-analysis were performed. The search was conducted on September 01, 2022. The data analysis software was RevMan 5.3.
Results
A total of 13 RCTs were included, including 687 patients. The results showed that compared with the control group, the overall difference in balance function was statistically significant [MD = 4.23, 95% CI 2.21 ∼ 6.26, p < 0.0001]. There was no significant difference in the evaluation indexes of lower limb motor function, including the TUG, 10MWT, 6MWT, and FMA - LE. The overall difference in lower limb muscle spasticity was statistically significant [MD = −0.53, 95% CI −0.81 ∼ 0.26, p = 0.0001].
Conclusions
Compared with the control group, using WBVT treatment has a more obvious effect on the recovery of lower limb function and muscle spasticity, and there is no obvious advantage in motor function recovery.
This Systematic Review and meta-analysis of evidence suggest that whole-body vibration training is effective in the rehabilitation of lower limb function in patients with stroke.
Whole body vibration training may be a better choice for improving balance and spasm in people with stroke.
Currently it is not known which whole-body vibration training model with vibration intensity, stimulus type and duration is most effective and to design more targeted interventions.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
Acknowledgments
We thank AJE (www.aje.com) for English language editing.
Author contributions
LN and YXW designed the study. YXW and XXL drafted the manuscript. LN was the principal investigator and guarantors. YXW, XXL and TH were the main coordinators of the study. LN conducted the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).