Prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in lower limb prosthesis users

Abstract

Purpose

Prostheses designed for daily use are often inappropriate for high-level activities and/or are susceptible to water damage and mechanical failure. Secondary prostheses, such as activity-specific or back-up prostheses, are typically required to facilitate uninterrupted participation in desired life pursuits. This study estimated the prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in a large, national sample of lower limb prosthesis users (LLPUs).

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of survey data from three cross-sectional studies that assessed mobility in LLPUs. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the percentage of secondary prosthesis users and percentages of LLPUs that used different type(s) of secondary prosthesis(es). Secondary prosthesis users and non-users were compared to identify differences in participant characteristics between groups.

Results

Of participants in the analysis (n = 1566), most (65.8%) did not use a secondary prosthesis. The most common secondary prosthesis types were back-up (19.2%) and activity-specific prostheses (13.5%). Secondary prosthesis users differed significantly from non-users with respect to gender, race, and other characteristics.

Conclusions

Results suggest that secondary prosthesis use for most LLPUs is limited and may differ based on users’ demographic and clinical characteristics. Future research should determine how LLPUs’ health-related quality-of-life outcomes are affected by access to and use of secondary prostheses.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Secondary prostheses, including activity-specific, back-up, and shower prostheses, have the potential to improve function, mobility, and participation for people who use lower limb prostheses.

• Most lower limb prosthesis users do not use secondary prostheses, and access to these devices may be related to users’ demographic and clinical characteristics.

• Rehabilitation professionals play a key role in facilitating prosthesis users’ access to secondary prostheses and should advocate for those who need them.

Keywords:

• Artificial limbs
• amputation
• sport prosthesis
• running prosthesis
• back-up prosthesis
• shower prosthesis
• water prosthesis

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Alyssa Bamer, MPH, and Rana Salem, MA for their assistance with data management and analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD065340.