211
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Acquired brain injury (ABI) survivors’ experience of occupation and activity during their inpatient stay: a scoping review

&
Received 17 May 2023, Accepted 02 Nov 2023, Published online: 20 Nov 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

This review aimed to characterise and map: (1) what type of evidence and what dominant study characteristics are available regarding acquired brain injury (ABI) survivors’ experience of occupation and activity in hospital? (2) How are occupation and activity conceptualised in the literature? (3) How are ABI survivors experiencing occupation and activity while in hospital? (4) What factors create barriers or opportunities for engagement in occupations or activity in hospital? (5) Are there any knowledge gaps identified?

Materials and methods

A scoping review was conducted examining literature published between 2017 and 2022. Relevant studies were systematically retrieved from electronic databases.

Results

Thirty-four publications were included. There were more quantitative studies (n = 18). Much of the research has been conducted outside of the UK. The populations studied were principally stroke (n = 22). The concept of activity rather than occupation predominates. Patients spend their time alone and inactive. Structural and contextual barriers for engaging in activity are identified. Qualitative study designs exclude ABI survivors with communication or cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

There is a paucity of research with ABI survivors in hospitals in the UK. Alternative methodological approaches such as ethnography would ensure those with communication or cognitive impairment are not excluded from research.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • Rehabilitation professionals, especially occupational therapists, need to lead acquired brain injury (ABI) research in acute hospital settings in the UK.

  • Conceptualisation of meaningful activity and occupation needs a clearer focus in ABI research.

  • Qualitative studies frequently exclude participants with cognitive or communication impairments so methodologies that are more inclusive and representative of brain injury survivors are needed.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank for Doctorate supervision provided by Dr H. M. Chapman and Dr A. Keen. This review forms part of a thesis towards a Professional Doctorate in Health and Social Care for the lead author.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

Support has been provided by the Elizabeth Casson Trust and the Hospital Trust where the first author works.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.