Modified landscapes: visitor’s perceptions of conservation in a natural reserve invaded by exotic conifers

Abstract

Biological invasions are considered a major problem for nature conservation globally. Natural resource managers make immense efforts to control invasions. However, many management strategies depend on public support. In this study, we assessed how recreational users perceive the conservation level of a protected area where the native forest has been altered by the introduction of the fire-adapted Pinus radiata, wildfires and the resulting invasion. We also analyzed how users’ definition of exotic species related to their perceptions and support for management actions. We found that 75% of respondents perceived the area to be well conserved, although 76% provided the correct definition for exotic species. Local, overnight and exotic-species knowledgeable users perceived the area’s conservation level to be lower than their counterparts. Also, local and knowledgeable people reported more support for management strategies. We interpret that the public’s positive perception of a heavily invaded landscape can be linked to bio-cultural homogenization.

Keywords:

• biological invasions
• Pinus radiata
• protected areas
• visitor survey
• Lago Epuyén Natural Reserve (Patagonia)

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Veronica Nuñez, Mariano Varela, Juan Salvador Mirabete and Liliana Barbosa for their help in designing, conducting and transcribing the questionnaires. We thank El Hoyo Tourism Bureau and the Forest Bureau of Chubut for providing the necessary information and permits.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

We are also grateful for the funding provided by the Programa de Becas del Programa Bosques Andinos, and the Agencia Suiza para el Desarrollo y la Cooperación (COSUDE). During this study, all authors were supported by the National Counsel for Scientific and Technical investigations of Argentina, currently undergoing massive budget cuts that endanger the continuity of their work. We thank three anonymous reviewers who have greatly improved this work with their comments.