ABSTRACT
Geoengineering is regarded by advocates as a creative and responsible technological option in the face of a climate emergency. Critics often see it as a hubristic attempt to play God, with disastrous consequences for the planet and humanity. These antipodal perspectives are represented by the ideal types of Prometheans and Gaians. Prometheans and Gaians typically talk past each other. The geoengineering debate can be made more fruitful by well articulating their respective positions and subsequently situating them in the discourse of sustainability. A sustainability orientation does not answer the troubling question whether geoengineering should be developed and deployed. But it can foster a ‘fusion of horizons’ between Prometheans and Gaians, providing common ground in an otherwise polarized debate and making a more productive dialogue possible.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Simon Nicholson and Sikina Jinnah for their close reading of the manuscript, and all the participants of the Academic Working Group on Climate Engineering Governance, organized by the Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment at American University, for their many helpful discussions and debates.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.