Faces in the museum: revising the methods of facial reconstructions

Abstract

Museum displays of faces derived from skeletal remains – typically referred to as facial reconstructions – are extraordinarily popular, and frequently function as iconic representations of a much broader engagement with collections from a particular people, time and place. Their actual ability to meaningfully represent either an individual or a museum collection is questionable, as facial reconstructions created for display and published within academic journals show an enduring preference for applying invalidated methods. Since 2002 there has been an increase in verified skull-soft tissue relationships, and these, together with research findings from related academic fields, can be incorporated within an evidence-based estimation of facial appearance. By illustration, a face given to an individual from the Museo de la Plata collection is critically revised to show how validated relationships result in a different face, and furthermore a face that is more closely aligned to what constitutes knowledge and display within the contemporary museum.

Keywords:

• facial approximation
• reconstruction
• methods
• validity
• museum display

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes on contributor

Dr Susan Hayes specialises in estimating the face from the skull using verified and transparent methods. Her research is primarily with archaeological and palaeoanthropological remains of modern, ancient and archaic humans. Dr Hayes is currently undertaking extended research in Indonesia, in collaboration with the Museum Geologi Bandung.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a Small Strategic Grant (2014) from the Centre of Archaeological Science, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Australia.