Publication Cover
Educational Action Research
Connecting Research and Practice for Professionals and Communities
Volume 21, 2013 - Issue 3
1,062
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Peered and tiered learning: action research as creative cultural pedagogy

Pages 412-428 | Received 13 Mar 2012, Accepted 14 Mar 2013, Published online: 20 Sep 2013
 

Abstract

This article presents and problematizes a peered and tiered model of creative and educational knowledge transfer piloted in Culture Shack, a community-based arts education program in Melbourne, Australia. Drawing on Eisner and Sefton-Green and Soep, I argue the value of this approach as a potential new pedagogical strategy in both secondary learning and teacher education courses, refocused on collaborative and process learning rather than outcome-focused pedagogy and assessment. Because education is a key factor for successful integration of those from refugee-background and emerging communities, self-reliance and creative problem-solving can be enhanced through arts programs such as Culture Shack that increase participation in continuing, collaborative educational pathways. In this paper I argue that this peered and tiered collaborative learning model offers possibilities for working cross-sectorally, interdisciplinarily, and interculturally for effective pedagogical outcomes and for the value of arts-based action research-as-pedagogy.

Acknowledgements

The author would firstly like to thank the anonymous reviewers who have contributed to improving the quality of this article’s argument, structure, and conceptual framework. The author thanks also the Culture Shack team and advisory group, for contributing to the development of this action research project. Please also note: the author was employed by Victoria University at the time of the research, and the program was funded by a Learning and Teaching Fund grant, and received the approval of the Victoria University Human Research Ethics Committee. All images are copyright of the author.

Notes

1. All participants’ names have been changed for purposes of anonymity, despite the research team having gained university ethics approval and participants’ informed consent for using identifying data such as photographs and video footage.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 367.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.