Abstract
In immediate serial recall, high‐frequency words are better recalled than low‐frequency words. A prevalent interpretation of this effect suggests that, at the point of recall, degraded representations undergo a reconstruction process calling upon long‐term knowledge of the to‐be‐remembered items. Recently, Stuart and Hulme (Citation2000) following Deese (Citation1960), suggested that high‐frequency items are better recalled due to their better long‐term associative links. Their results revealed that a familiarisation procedure involving repeated presentations of the to‐be‐remembered items in pairs abolished the usual frequency effect. In the experiment reported here, an alternative interpretation of this result is examined. Prior to the memory task, subjects received either no familiarisation, item familiarisation, or pair familiarisation. Both item and pair familiarisation improved the item recall of low‐frequency items to the same extent, suggesting that increased familiarity can account for the co‐occurrence effect.
Notes
Correspondence should be addressed to Jean Saint‐Aubin, Department of Psychology, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada, E1A 3E9 Email: saint‐[email protected]
This research was supported by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to Jean Saint‐Aubin. We thank Jacinthe LeBlanc and Nadine Léger for their assistance in preparing materials and collecting data.