482
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The fading affect bias: Effects of social disclosure to an interactive versus non-responsive listener

, &
Pages 829-847 | Received 24 Jun 2013, Accepted 30 May 2014, Published online: 27 Jun 2014
 

Abstract

The intensity of negative emotions associated with event memories fades to a greater extent over time than positive emotions (fading affect bias or FAB). In this study, we examine how the presence and behaviour of a listener during social disclosure influences the FAB and the linguistic characteristics of event narratives. Participants recalled pleasant and unpleasant events and rated each event for its emotional intensity. Recalled events were then allocated to one of three experimental conditions: no disclosure, private verbal disclosure without a listener or social disclosure to another participant whose behaviour was experimentally manipulated. Participants again rated the emotional intensity of the events immediately after these manipulations and after a one-week delay. Verbal disclosure alone was not sufficient to enhance the FAB. However, social disclosure increased positive emotional intensity, regardless of the behaviour of the listener. Whilst talking to an interactive listener led unpleasant event memories to decrease in emotional intensity, talking to a non-responsive listener increased their negative emotional intensity. Further, listener behaviour influenced the extent of emotional expression in written event narratives. This study provides original evidence that listener behaviour during social disclosure is an important factor in the effects of social disclosure in the FAB.

Portions of this research were presented at the British Psychological Society Cognitive Section Annual Conference (2010), the 5th International Conference on Memory (2011) and the iCog Inaugural Interdisciplinarity in Cognitive Science Conference (2013). This research was supported by a Ph.D. scholarship awarded to Kate Muir from the Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, UK, under the supervision of Dr Charity Brown and Dr Anna Madill and forms part of Kate Muir's Ph.D. thesis. We would like to thank everyone who took part in this research. We are grateful also to Rhiannon Turner and anonymous reviewers for their comments on a draft of this paper.

Portions of this research were presented at the British Psychological Society Cognitive Section Annual Conference (2010), the 5th International Conference on Memory (2011) and the iCog Inaugural Interdisciplinarity in Cognitive Science Conference (2013). This research was supported by a Ph.D. scholarship awarded to Kate Muir from the Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, UK, under the supervision of Dr Charity Brown and Dr Anna Madill and forms part of Kate Muir's Ph.D. thesis. We would like to thank everyone who took part in this research. We are grateful also to Rhiannon Turner and anonymous reviewers for their comments on a draft of this paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 354.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.