454
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports

Visuospatial working memory, auditory discrimination, and attention

, &
Pages 568-574 | Received 09 May 2018, Accepted 27 Sep 2018, Published online: 11 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

The present study examined the degree to which tests of visuospatial storage capacity tap into domain-general storage and attention processes. This was done by comparing performance of visuospatial memory tasks with performance on sound-based sensory discrimination tasks. We found that memory task- and discrimination task performance both tapped into a cross-modality factor (visual and auditory). We further examined the degree to which this common variance could be explained by attention control and sustained attention. These attention factors accounted for roughly 60% of the variance in memory. This indicates that tests of visuospatial memory capacity reflect more than modality-specific memory.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Correlations between our DVs and the one described were .94 for PVT, .80 for CRT, and .95 for SART, Reliabilities, on the other hand, were substantially reduced when SD was divided by RT. Thus, we retained our original DV.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 354.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.