787
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Constructing autobiographical events within a spatial or temporal context: a comparison of two targeted episodic induction techniques

, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 881-893 | Received 10 Dec 2018, Accepted 14 Feb 2019, Published online: 08 Mar 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Recalling and imagining autobiographical experiences involves constructing event representations within spatiotemporal contexts. We tested whether generating autobiographical events within a primarily spatial (where the event occurred) or temporal (the sequence of actions that occurred) context affected how the associated mental representation was constructed. We leveraged the well-validated episodic specificity induction (ESI) technique, known to influence the use of episodic processes on subsequent tasks, to develop variants that selectively enhance spatial or temporal processing. We tested the effects of these inductions on the details used to describe past and future autobiographical events. We first replicated the standard ESI effect, showing that ESI enhances generating episodic details, particularly those that are perception-based, when describing autobiographical events (Experiment 1). We then directly compared the effects of the spatial and temporal inductions (Experiment 2 and 3). When describing autobiographical events, spatial induction enhanced generating episodic details, specifically perception-based details, compared to the control or temporal inductions. A greater proportion of the episodic details generated after the temporal induction were gist-based than after the spatial induction, but this proportion did not differ from a control induction. Thus, using a spatial or temporal framework for autobiographical event generation alters the associated details that are accessed.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Wendy Wang, Stephanie Simpson, Carina Fan, Sonja Chu, and Idil Uner who contributed to testing and scoring. SS designed the study, analysed the data, and drafted the manuscript with input from LG, KM and DS. This study was supported by funds provided from an NSERC Discovery grant awarded to SS (#RGPIN-04241) as well as from the Canadian Research Chair Program. DLS was supported by National Institute of Mental Health R01 MH060941 and National Institute on Aging R01 AG008441. KPM was supported by National Institute on Aging grant F32AG059341.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by an NSERC Discovery grant awarded to SS (#RGPIN-04241) and funds provided to SS from the Canadian Research Chair Program.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 354.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.