Publication Cover
Gender, Place & Culture
A Journal of Feminist Geography
Volume 23, 2016 - Issue 1
2,290
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
The stickiness of emotions in the field

Boundary-making in feminist research: new methodologies for ‘intimate insiders’

&
Pages 94-106 | Received 15 Aug 2013, Accepted 26 Jan 2014, Published online: 12 Aug 2014
 

Abstract

In the past 20 years, feminist geographers have gone to great lengths to complicate notions of ‘the field’ and make clear that the field is not an easily bounded space. This body of work has demonstrated the complexity of field spaces, explored ways to destabilize boundaries, and traced the power relations between researchers and participants. Ultimately, this work takes the breaking down of boundaries as an inherent good in field research, and, subsequently, little work has focused explicitly on the utility of physical and emotional boundaries that develop in field research. Our experiences as feminist geographers who reside in our fields show there is much left to understand and subsequently disrupt regarding the boundaries of ‘the field.’ In this article, we build on the concept of ‘intimate insiders’ to discuss the complex negotiation of doing research in the places where we have created personal lives and our sense of community. We often found ourselves struggling to define the physical and emotional boundaries of ‘the field’ on the outside for the sake of our participants and ourselves. In this article, we reflect on boundary-making as a specific feminist methodological practice for addressing the complexity of fieldwork. We discuss the techniques and strategies we used for conducting research in the communities in which we are long-term community residents. In the tradition of feminist methodology, we draw from our research experiences in State College and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to reconsider how producing distance through boundary-making has the potential to benefit our participants, our projects, and ourselves.

Establecer límites en la investigación feminista: nuevas metodologías para las “personas que pertenecen íntimamente”

En los últimos veinte años, las geógrafas feministas han hecho un gran esfuerzo para complicar las nociones del “campo” y dejar en claro que el campo no es un espacio claramente limitado. Este trabajo ha demostrado la complejidad de los espacios del campo, ha explorado las maneras de desestabilizar los límites, y ha rastreado las relaciones de poder entre investigadores y participantes. En última instancia, este trabajo toma a la ruptura de límites como algo inherentemente bueno en la investigación de campo, y subsecuentemente, poco trabajo se ha centrado explícitamente en la utilidad de los límites físicos y emocionales que se desarrollan en dicha investigación. Nuestras experiencias como geógrafas feministas que residen en nuestros campos muestran que hay mucho por comprender y subsecuentemente desestabilizar con respecto a los límites del “campo”. En este artículo, construimos sobre el concepto de “personas que pertenecen íntimamente” para discutir la negociación compleja de investigar en lugares donde hemos creado vidas personales y nuestro sentido de comunidad. A menudo nos encontramos luchando por definir los límites físicos y emocionales del “campo” en el afuera por el bien de nuestros participantes y nosotras mismas. En este artículo reflexionamos sobre el establecimiento de límites como una práctica metodológica feminista específica para abordar la complejidad del trabajo de campo. Discutimos las técnicas y estrategias que usamos para llevar a cabo la investigación en las comunidades en las que somos residentes de hace mucho tiempo. En la tradición de la metodología feminista, nos basamos en nuestras experiencias de investigación en State College y Filadelfia, Pensilvania para reconsiderar cómo producir la distancia a través de la creación de límites tiene el potencial de beneficiar a nuestros participantes, nuestros proyectos y a nosotras mismas.

在女性主义研究中创造边界:“亲密内部人”的崭新方法论

过去二十年来,女性主义地理学者已大幅复杂化了“田野”的概念,并明确指出田野并不是一个简单地由边界界定的空间。此类研究工作,已显示出田野空间的复杂性、探讨了颠覆边界的方法,并追溯研究者和参与者之间的权力关係。最终,这些研究将边界的瓦解视为田野研究中的内在良善,然随之而来的却是,鲜少研究明确聚焦在田野研究中筑起物理及情绪边界的效用。我们身为居住于田野中的女性主义地理学者的经验显示,关于“田野”中的边界,仍有许多需要被理解并进一步瓦解之处。我们在本文中,建构“亲密内部人”的概念,用以探讨在我们已创造个人生活及社区感的地方进行研究中的复杂协商。为了研究的参与者以及我们自身 ,我们经常发现自己在外头挣扎着界定“田野”的物理及情绪边界。我们于本文中,反思划定边界作为处理田野复杂性的特定女性主义方法实践,并探讨我们在长期居住的社区中进行研究所运用的技巧与策略。在女性主义方法论的传统中,我们採用自身在宾州费城州立学院的研究经验,藉此再思考透过边界划定创造距离,如何具有嘉惠研究参与者、我们的计画,以及我们自身的潜力。

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the three, very helpful anonymous reviewers and the journal editors, Drs Melissa Wright and Lorraine Dowler, and our dear friends in Penn State's feminist writing group for their comments on earlier drafts of this article and all of their support and guidance throughout our projects. We are especially grateful to our research participants, who all graciously gave their energy, time, and care in support of our projects.

Additional information

Funding

Dana Cuomo's work was supported by the National Science Foundation [grant number 1301630], the Society of Women Geographers and the American Association of University Women. Vanessa Massaro's work is supported by the National Science Foundation [grant number 1333176], the Africana Research Center and the Association of American Geographers.

Notes on contributors

Dana Cuomo

Dana Cuomo is a doctoral candidate in the Departments of Geography and Women's Studies at Penn State University. Her dissertation research examines policing and prosecution practices used to address intimate partner violence.

Vanessa A. Massaro

Vanessa Massaro is a doctoral candidate in the Departments of Geography and Women's Studies at Penn State University. Her dissertation research examines the drug economy in Grays Ferry, Philadelphia.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 384.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.