Reply to Machery: Against the Argument from Citation

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Notes

1. As cited in Machery (2019, 616).

2. Hughes cites Lasonen-Aarino (2010).

3. An anonymous referee has insightfully noted that Machery will likely have to rely on the method of cases to demonstrate that Hawthorne and Srinivasan (2013) view is not a plausible contender in the epistemology of disagreement. But the Dogmatism Argument rules this out. Hence, the self-defeating objection rears its head once again.