Questioning the professionalization of recovery: a collaborative exploration of a recovery process

Abstract

While the recovery concept strongly resonates in clinical mental health care today, it first arose in service user-led contexts. A major risk of this professionalization shift is that recovery primarily becomes defined by treatment providers. This study aims to keep the debate on recovery alive through a collaborative exploration of Pete’s recovery process by means of a bricolage approach. This resulted in an idiographic portrait of Pete’s experiences of recovery and treatment, clustered around four themes: life rebuilding, identity, continuity of care and the role of drugs. His experiences illustrate a number of contradictions in the operationalization of the recovery ethos in today’s mental health care; whilst recovery appears as a hopeful vision of empowerment, it also risks being reduced to a tokenistic model that fails to address the social realities of people in recovery and in which the assumption that mental illness is chronic is still latently present.

Keywords:

• Recovery
• mental health
• collaborative research
• bricolage
• co-creation

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Special Research Fund (Ghent University) [Grant 01D33515].