377
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Striving to abolish a deficit approach to disability: frames applied by frontline workers and activist entrepreneurs in employment

Pages 1725-1746 | Received 02 Dec 2021, Accepted 16 Dec 2022, Published online: 02 Jan 2023
 

Abstract

Frontline workers engaged in enabling employment and activist entrepreneurs strive to reframe disability as they facilitate work inclusion. They do so in an organisational and societal context that emphasises labour-market participation. Frontline workers facilitate this inclusion when they implement and construct disability employment policies at the street level, while activist entrepreneurs do so when they privilege hiring disabled people. Based on interviews in this study within a Norwegian welfare context, I show how both groups of actors strive to abolish a deficit approach in distinct yet overlapping ways. They do so by framing disabled people in terms of their assets and contributions rather than foregrounding their needs and challenges. While the entrepreneurs brought up ways in which disability can be a central part of identity that should be recognised and talked about, the frontline workers promoted assets in an individualised manner. Nevertheless, the deficit approach is maintained in subtle ways.

Points of interest

  • The social political context that emphasises employment for all encourages key stakeholders to abolish the deficit approach to disability.

  • Social actors use different angles or perspectives to understand complex social phenomena, such as disability.

  • Both frontline workers and activist entrepreneurs provide perspectives that highlight disabled people’s assets and contributions rather than foregrounding their needs and challenges. Despite engagement in highlighting disabled people’s assets, the deficit approach is still maintained in subtle ways.

  • Activist entrepreneurs could provide input into the design of disability employment policies.

Disclosure statement

No conflict of interest has been reported by the author.

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Norges Forskningsr?d.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 479.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.