Impact of participation in a peer-led overdose program for people who use drugs

Abstract

Opioid overdose prevention training programs represent harm reduction initiatives for people who use drugs (PWUD). While studies have investigated their impact after participants have intervened in overdose situations, the impact of the training alone has not been examined in detail. This study explores the personal impact, including benefits and apprehensions, for PWUD who participated in a peer-led overdose prevention program and did not intervene post-training. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 75 PWUD following training. Data collection took place in two phases (2016 and 2020; n = 37 and 38, respectively), and qualitative results of a thematic analysis are presented. The following participation benefits were reported, even if no naloxone administration occurred following training: improved sense of control and competency in potential overdose and other emergency situations, heightened feelings of responsibility to help others, overcoming social stigma, increased pride, confidence and self-esteem, renewed sense of hope, and changed drug use behaviours, namely reduced at-risk consumption behaviours. Over half of participants reported sharing prevention knowledge with others following training. As for apprehensions, participants reported: fear of intervening and of being stigmatized, disappointment and regret related to past overdose experiences, feeling burdened or stressed to intervene, and cutting ties with others to avoid overdose situations.

Keywords:

• Overdose
• training
• peer-helper

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants and peer-trainers of the PROFAN program, as well as the program partners, Guillaume Tremblay, coordinator for the project, and the other members of the Meta d'Âme team for their collaboration

Ethical approval

Research ethics approval for this study was obtained by the Research Ethics Committee on Addiction, social inequality and public health of the Integrated university health and social services centre of the Montreal South-Centre.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this study was received from the CRISM-Québec-Maritimes Research on interventions in drug misuse initiative of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Montreal Public Health Directorate. Funding for the writing of this manuscript was received from the Institut universitaire sur les dépendances.